Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F38C5380001F5; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:54:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QrCy5-00041e-0n for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:53:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QrCy4-00041V-J5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:53:24 +0100 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QrCy2-0005Wi-4Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:53:24 +0100 Received: by iyk2 with SMTP id 2so2631620iyk.4 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:53:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tTdwBI4mvqxCeyIinGH4nwzQJRzTfCFEq8YgB0eFgYk=; b=f5aRBTzemRBIs7PMiugGR+3f++x/Vn4sPE+LJhc3/L/GN+C62QA2Uv+6dbN7edymvH s0lkrixYfBY7KQT1RnAOlk92W3AzSr/SXM2bSOERreN7vrPNgkGduddUo4XKMsTB0+B6 Vco3CitLva1oNySXLUqCdb0eDaxlFyFiCiZbw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.118.133 with SMTP id v5mr10001388ibq.97.1312998796014; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.139 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:53:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <006601cc5784$f636d530$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <4E418609.6020500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto> <008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto> <4E41AECB.90808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto> <4E427DFB.50801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0FA38FC9F88F41738D007D00C0B66503@PcMinto> <002e01cc5772$40601a30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <09706552FC574901BA413DC5295F48F5@AGB> <004e01cc5780$a98a3820$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <006601cc5784$f636d530$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:53:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: HB9ASB... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501446ed3b3af04aa2a5a0d X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:428082592:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m010.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd4e42c5eb19ce X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --00504501446ed3b3af04aa2a5a0d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If the only other element is the mast, and that's away from local QRM it all works as it should. Not necesasrily anything like as bad as the full length of the feeder contributing to pickup. And why's it "highly unlikely" the Tx isn't in the same box?. I'm assuming, but I'd certainly try a licence-free 868MHz wideband FM link, or a 2.4GHz FM TV one. They're tiny postage stamp sized modules, and should offer enough dynamic range where no strong local stuff is nearby. Electronics has moved on since your day OM :-) Andy www.g4jnt.com On 10 August 2011 18:42, mal hamilton wrote: > ** > Andy > Highly unlikely that the link-tx is in the same box, even so the other > element as u say would be the the mast/mounting and that could be say 20 > plus feet, just as bad as the feeder senario!! > g3kev > > > ----- > > --00504501446ed3b3af04aa2a5a0d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If the only other element is the mast, and that's away from local = QRM it all works as it should.=A0 Not necesasrily anything like as bad as t= he full length of the=A0feeder contributing to pickup.
=A0
And why's it "highly unlikely" the Tx isn't in the s= ame box?.=A0=A0 I'm assuming, but I'd certainly try a licence-free = 868MHz wideband FM link, or a 2.4GHz FM TV one.=A0 They're tiny postage= stamp sized modules, and should offer enough dynamic range where no strong= local stuff is nearby.
=A0
Electronics has moved on since your day OM :-)
=A0
Andy
=A0
=A0
On 10 August 2011 18:42, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net= > wrote:
Andy
Highly unlikely that the link-tx is in the same b= ox, even so the other element as u say would be the the mast/mounting and t= hat could be say 20 plus feet,=A0 just as bad as the feeder senario!!
g3kev
=A0
-----
--00504501446ed3b3af04aa2a5a0d--