Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1AC5C3800009B; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:26:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QrvUK-0005OE-5W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:25:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QrvUJ-0005O5-6u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:25:39 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s36.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QrvUH-0005nV-0S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:25:38 +0100 Received: from BLU153-W13 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s36.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:25:30 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [138.32.32.166] From: Laurence KL7UK To: Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:25:29 -0800 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <003e01cc5777$c33532b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <4E418609.6020500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto><008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto><4E41AECB.90808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto><4E427DFB.50801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<003e01cc5777$c33532b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2011 17:25:30.0639 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5B2E1F0:01CC5914] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_a7f94ddc-f051-4e0b-9b21-c51ad132fae1_" Subject: LF: screened room and the probe/mini X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:472073120:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf4e45624f62c0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_a7f94ddc-f051-4e0b-9b21-c51ad132fae1_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Now place the receiver and the rest of the local world with all its noise = and QRM generators in a screened room and make the feed coaxial through a b= ulkhead connector into teh screened room and see what happens. All the QR= M is contained within the screened room and cannot pass outside. The ant= enna is now a strange sort-of dipole with one end in free space=2C and the = other connected to a solid mass made from the outside of the screened room.= It can't pick up any QRM from inside the screened room=2C and all it wil= l now receive are signals generating an E-field between the probe and the s= olid mass. Perfect! =20 The shack and the rest of the world is not in a screened room=2C so there l= ies the problem. " =20 =20 Andy notes -=20 =20 This is a very good prinicple and has served me very well in hotels=2C high= rises etc that tended to have a metallic rebar/frame content.... we dont h= ave trees in a lot of the locations I find myself in** =20 I found that often=2C by selecting a metal window frame=2C outside door or = similar bonded to the structure appx 30-40dB common mode noise coming from = the hotel room up the cable is eliminated. keep the strap from the coax sho= rt (small reactance needed) though if your listening on HF. Mine are max 0= .3m long... =20 Selecting the actual structure to %^&**# (nearly said it) is an art form an= d its amazing the number of windows or doors are defacto half or fully touc= hing the rebar/building frame. This as Andy says gives a defacto (sometimes= leaky) Faraday cage and if you can select the probe in a favorable positio= n outside and up over the edge of a building youll probably get fair resul= ts. Ive used this solution in Singapore=2C China=2C Indonesia=2C Malaysia= =2C Chile etc and got what I would call good results. Not ruffling my feath= ers but received Eu on 500 and 137 on a PA0RDT from most of those locations= on a quiet/favorable day=2C and I would lay a hefty wager for these locati= ons a 20/30m long wire suitably matched would have been worse....just inter= cepting too much rubbish... =20 Im guessing some of the UK brick houses built in the 40/50 and 60's with th= e older window/outside frames will oblidge... =20 Now a lot of Buildings in say Alaska/Oklahoma are only wooden framed and t= hus are fairly transparent to RF at LF/MF and HF - (use a portable radio on= SW with its whip and try to see what you can hear inside a metal framed/bo= nded building=2C:-) )) - For instance in Alaska I have all sort of problems= from common mode and direct radiation noise - I found that a single or mor= e earth rod where the coax comes in helps a tadge=2C but with common mode c= hoke using peaky turns at the required freq helps a little more=2C sometime= s=2C isolation transformers more as long as you can keep inthe intercap dow= n and remind yourself they have to be phased properly on a toriod. But the = best Ive found was to extend my ^%$# mat (mulitple = wires radiating away) from the shack window out to where the probe is in th= e air as far as possible - and to keep these wires way way away from the el= ectrical protection earth rods from the incoming supply which have their ow= n noise and currents.... =20 I like the idea of remote power=2C optic cables=2C with small counterpoises= or balanced array=2C but for simplicity an PA0RDT/AMRAD or modified themes= are hard to beat for those poor souls like me that have to select a small = quietish spot=2C dont have trees or real estate=2C or a nearly handy bonded= and rebar/metal framed building... =20 If I build a new house Im going to get them to pull and staple 12 gauge sol= id cable every metre up and over vertically the whole length of the buildin= g and bond this to the @#%$# rebar.... =20 Laurence KL7UK et al =20 =20 =20 **Acacia trees for some reason are my tree of choice for hoisting up - Palm= trees for some reason arent so good. Im testing Pecan trees at this time := -)) =20 From: g3kevmal@talktalk.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed=2C 10 Aug 2011 17:08:37 +0100 Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB... =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Andy Talbot=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday=2C August 10=2C 2011 4:30 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB... I'm surprised so many seem to misunderstand how high impedance E-field prob= es work. There is too much hearsay and false comments being peddled. Sto= p thinking of the feeder as 'part' of the antenna as if it were all one ent= ity and consider each stage.... And forget that thing called Ground complet= ely. =20 It starts with a high input-impedance amplifier which must have two connect= ions - ignore any common reference for now=2C it just has two input pins. = A voltage is imposed across these from any antenna with two ports=2C like = a short dipole. This input voltage is buffered=2C amplified=2C and sent = to the two output pins from which it travels down a feeder - balanced=2C co= ax=2C or whatever - and into your receiver. So far we haven't made any c= onnection between input and output=2C and they could (and ideally would) be= independent and isolated from eachother =20 However=2C they're not. One input connection is usually common with one o= utput - usually the 0V DC supply pin and the reference (and please note= =2C I am not referring to this as ground=3B ground is taboo=2C a dirty word= =2C and will not be mentioned) Which means the other hot-side input pin= now has a voltage imposed on it with respect to the reference. This will = probably come from a probe antenna which is coupling to the E-field of a ra= diated signal. Now=2C bear in mind any antenna must have two output ports= =2C so where is the other side? As the reference input pin is connected t= o the output reference pin=2C any other connection to this point will form = the other 'half' of the high impedance short dipole antenna. =20 Now=2C the feeder dropping down from the amplifier / probe assembly (or acr= oss=2C or up and over=2C or buried in the soil [see=2C still didn't say the= taboo word] ) is connected to the input reference pin by virtue of the amp= lifiers internally linking them=2C and must therefore form the other half o= f the dipole. This is bad. We have a hi-Z dipole=2C with one short elem= ent in the air where it should be=2C and the other element being one conduc= tor of a probably long length of feeder with its end connected to we know-n= ot-what. =20 So what do we now have? A long assymetric dipole plus amplifier assembly= =2C stretching from some arbitrary shack connection up into free space. T= he voltage at the not-middle of this is the stuff that is amplified and fed= to the receiver. So=2C as the bulk of the dipole is close to the shack = expect the majority of signal received to be locally generated noise. =20 =20 That is the case for a completely unscreened and un-earthed (still didn't u= se the word :-) system. Picking up any locally generated E-fields at high= levels onto the dipole. =20 =20 Now place the receiver and the rest of the local world with all its noise a= nd QRM generators in a screened room and make the feed coaxial through a bu= lkhead connector into teh screened room and see what happens. All the QRM= is contained within the screened room and cannot pass outside. The ante= nna is now a strange sort-of dipole with one end in free space=2C and the o= ther connected to a solid mass made from the outside of the screened room. = It can't pick up any QRM from inside the screened room=2C and all it will= now receive are signals generating an E-field between the probe and the so= lid mass. Perfect! =20 The shack and the rest of the world is not in a screened room=2C so there l= ies the problem. However much you don't want it to be=2C with this setup = the feeder will always form the majority of the antenna because there is no= thing else there that can be the other half of the dipole. And if the bot= tom end of the dipole intrudes into the rest of the world=2C it will pick u= p stuff it shouldn't =20 Andy =20 So the FEEDER does form the majority part of this type of antenna=2C simply= one side of a very poor asymetrical dipole. It would appear this is not the antenna for a noisy urban environment The long element of the dipole is picking up every possible noise and ampli= fying it and feeding all this noise plus signal to the RX=2C the minute Pro= be element is insignificant.=20 This has been my observation all along. =20 G3KEV =20 = --_a7f94ddc-f051-4e0b-9b21-c51ad132fae1_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Now place the receiver and the rest of the local world with all i= ts noise and QRM generators in a screened room and make the feed coaxial th= rough a bulkhead connector into teh screened room =3Band see what happe= ns. =3B =3B All the QRM is contained = within the screened room and cannot pass outside. =3B&n= bsp=3B =3B The antenna is now a strange sort-of dipole with one end in = free space=2C and the other connected to a solid mass made from the outside= of the screened room. =3B =3B It can't pick up any QRM from inside= the screened room=2C and all it will now receive are signals generating an= E-field between the probe and the solid mass. =3B Perfect!
 =3B
The shack and the rest of the world =3Bis not in a screened ro= om=2C so there =3Blies the problem. =3B"
 =3B
 =3B
Andy notes -
 =3B
This is a very good prinicple and has served me very well in hotels=2C= high rises etc that tended to have a metallic rebar/frame content.... we d= ont have trees in a lot of the locations I find myself in**
 =3B
I found that often=2C by selecting a metal window frame=2C outside doo= r or similar bonded to the structure appx 30-40dB common mode noise coming = from the hotel room up the cable is eliminated. keep the strap from the coa= x short =3B (small reactance needed) though if your listening on HF. Mi= ne are max 0.3m long...
 =3B
Selecting the actual structure to %^&=3B**# (nearly said it) is an = art form and its amazing the number of windows or doors are defacto half or= fully touching the rebar/building frame. This as Andy says gives a defacto= (sometimes leaky) Faraday cage and if you can select the probe in a favora= ble position outside and =3B up over the edge of a building youll proba= bly get fair results. Ive used this solution in Singapore=2C China=2C Indon= esia=2C Malaysia=2C Chile etc and got what I would call good results. Not r= uffling my feathers but received Eu on 500 and 137 on a PA0RDT from most of= those locations on a quiet/favorable day=2C and I would lay a hefty wager = for these locations a 20/30m long wire suitably matched would have been wor= se....just intercepting too much rubbish...
 =3B
Im guessing some of the UK brick houses built in the 40/50 and 60's wi= th the older window/outside frames will oblidge...
 =3B
Now a lot of Buildings in say Alaska/Oklahoma  =3Bare only wooden = framed and thus are fairly transparent to RF at LF/MF and HF - (use a porta= ble radio on SW with its whip and try to see what you can hear inside a met= al framed/bonded building=2C:-) )) - For instance in Alaska I have all sort= of problems from common mode and direct radiation noise - I found that a s= ingle or more earth rod where the coax comes in helps a tadge=2C but with c= ommon mode choke using peaky turns at the required freq helps a little more= =2C sometimes=2C isolation transformers more as long as you can keep inthe = intercap down and remind yourself they have to be phased properly on a tori= od. But the best Ive found was to extend my ^%$# mat <=3Bnearly said it a= gain>=3B  =3B(mulitple wires radiating =3Baway) =3Bfrom the s= hack window out to where the probe is in the air as far as possible - and t= o keep these wires way way away from the electrical protection earth rods f= rom the incoming supply which have their own noise and currents....
 =3B
I like the idea of remote power=2C optic cables=2C with small counterp= oises or balanced array=2C but for simplicity an PA0RDT/AMRAD or modified t= hemes are hard to beat for those poor souls like me that have to select a s= mall quietish spot=2C dont have trees or real estate=2C or a nearly handy&n= bsp=3Bbonded and rebar/metal framed building...
 =3B
If I build a new house Im going to get them to pull and staple 12 gaug= e solid cable every metre up and over vertically the whole length of the bu= ilding and bond this to the @#%$# <=3Bnearly said it >=3B rebar....
 =3B
Laurence KL7UK et al
 =3B
 =3B
 =3B
**Acacia trees for some reason are my tree of choice for hoisting up -= Palm trees for some reason arent so good. Im testing Pecan trees at this t= ime :-))
 =3B

From: g3kevmal@talktalk.net
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: We= d=2C 10 Aug 2011 17:08:37 +0100
Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...

 =3B
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday=2C August 10=2C 2011= 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: HB9ASB...

I'm surprised so many seem to misunderstand how high impedance E-field= probes work. =3B =3BThere is =3Btoo much hearsay and false com= ments being peddled. =3B  =3BStop thinking of the feeder as 'part' = of the antenna as if it were all one entity and consider =3Beach stage.= ... And forget that thing called Ground completely.
 =3B
It starts with a =3Bhigh input-impedance amplifier which =3Bmu= st have =3Btwo connections - ignore any =3Bcommon reference for now= =2C it just has two input pins. =3B A voltage is imposed across these f= rom any antenna with two ports=2C  =3Blike a short dipole. =3B = =3B This input voltage is buffered=2C amplified=2C =3B and sent to the = two output pins from which it travels down a feeder - balanced=2C coax=2C o= r whatever -  =3Band into your receiver. =3B =3B So far we have= n't made any connection between input and output=2C and they could (and ide= ally would) be independent and isolated from eachother
 =3B
However=2C they're not. =3B =3B One input connection is usuall= y common with one output - usually the  =3B0V DC supply pin and the ref= erence  =3B(and please note=2C I =3Bam not referring to this = =3Bas ground=3B ground is taboo=2C a dirty word=2C  =3Band will not be = mentioned) =3B =3B =3B =3BWhich =3Bmeans the other hot-= side input pin now has a voltage imposed on it with respect to the referenc= e. =3B This will probably come from a probe antenna which is coupling t= o the E-field of a radiated signal. =3B =3B Now=2C bear in mind any= antenna must have two output ports=2C so where is the other side? =3B&= nbsp=3B As the reference input pin is connected to the output reference pin= =2C any other connection to this point will form the other 'half' of the hi= gh impedance short dipole antenna.
 =3B
Now=2C the feeder dropping down from the amplifier / probe assembly&nb= sp=3B(or across=2C or up and over=2C or buried in the soil [see=2C still di= dn't say the taboo word] =3B) is connected to the input reference pin b= y virtue of the amplifiers internally linking them=2C and must therefore fo= rm the other half of the dipole. =3B =3B This is bad. =3B = =3B We have a hi-Z dipole=2C with one short element in the air where it sho= uld be=2C and the other element being one conductor of a probably long leng= th of feeder with its end connected to we know-not-what.
 =3B
So what do we now have? =3B A long assymetric dipole plus amplifie= r assembly=2C stretching from some arbitrary shack connection up into free = space. =3B =3B The voltage at the not-middle of this is the =3B= stuff that is amplified and fed to the receiver. =3B =3B =3B So= =2C as the bulk of the dipole is close to the shack expect the majority of = signal received to be locally generated noise. =3B =3B
 =3B
That is the case for a completely unscreened and un-earthed (still did= n't use the word :-) =3B system. =3B Picking up any locally generat= ed E-fields at high levels onto the dipole. =3B
 =3B
Now place the receiver and the rest of the local world with all its no= ise and QRM generators in a screened room and make the feed coaxial through= a bulkhead connector into teh screened room =3Band see what happens.&n= bsp=3B =3B All the QRM is contained within the screened room and cannot= pass outside. =3B =3B =3B The antenna is now a strange sort-of= dipole with one end in free space=2C and the other connected to a solid ma= ss made from the outside of the screened room. =3B =3B It can't pic= k up any QRM from inside the screened room=2C and all it will now receive a= re signals generating an E-field between the probe and the solid mass. = =3B Perfect!
 =3B
The shack and the rest of the world =3Bis not in a screened room= =2C so there =3Blies the problem. =3B =3B However much you don'= t want it to be=2C with this setup =3Bthe feeder will always fo= rm the majority of the antenna because there is nothing else there that can= be the other half of the dipole. =3B =3B And if the botto= m end of the dipole intrudes into the rest of the world=2C it will pick up = stuff it shouldn't
 =3B
Andy
 =3B
So the FEEDER does form the majority part of this t= ype of antenna=2C simply one side of a very poor asymetrical dipole.=
It would appear this is not the antenna for a noisy= urban environment
The long element of the dipole is picking up every = possible noise and amplifying it and feeding all this noise plus signal to = the RX=2C the minute =3BProbe element is insignificant. =3B<= /DIV>
This has been my observation all along.
 =3B
G3KEV
 =3B
 =3B
=
= --_a7f94ddc-f051-4e0b-9b21-c51ad132fae1_--