Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 12E733800008C; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:51:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QpxBv-0004n0-6d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 07:50:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QpxBu-0004mr-FK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 07:50:30 +0100 Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QpxBr-0002TH-TY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 07:50:30 +0100 Received: from mtaout-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.1]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p776oNKL021649 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:50:23 -0400 Received: from White (nrbg-4d057a10.pool.mediaWays.net [77.5.122.16]) by mtaout-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 79A79E000139 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <939DBF2301B54955934FB75A827F8686@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <6D22E80876A64669A90346E1C7769908@White> <003201cc545f$91996fc0$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 08:50:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:467804896:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: test Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01CC54DF.0D5E3620" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:496240192:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb4e3e360971a1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01CC54DF.0D5E3620 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alan, thanks for thr reply. My problem was I had sent either message = twice before, without seeing any response. Spam rating in a bad mood? On = the following morning, I posted again, and the they came around within = minutes. Best 73, Markus From: Alan Melia=20 Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 7:37 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: Re: test Hi Markus my reflect time is just 2 min later than the post time in the message. Looking at the header when you disentangle the local time time-stamps it would seem that there as no delay in Blacksheep handling = it. I wonder when it was posted and when you received the response. I only = know the time of my receipt of course not the time when your copy would be = sent. Similar with the QSY mesage. I wonder which path inwards or outward is experiencing the delay. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Markus Vester" To: Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 7:53 AM Subject: LF: test it seems like the RSGB reflector has been rather an absorber again... = 73, Markus ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01CC54DF.0D5E3620 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Alan, thanks for thr reply. My = problem was I=20 had sent either message twice before, without seeing any = response.=20 Spam rating in a bad mood? On the following morning, I posted again, and = the=20 they came around within minutes.
 
Best 73, Markus

From: Alan Melia
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 7:37 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: LF: Re: test

Hi Markus my=20 reflect time is just 2 min later than the post time in the
message. = Looking=20 at the header when you disentangle the local time
time-stamps it = would seem=20 that there as no delay in Blacksheep handling it.
I wonder when it = was posted=20 and when you received the response. I only know
the time of my = receipt of=20 course not the time when your copy would be sent.

Similar with = the QSY=20 mesage. I wonder which path inwards or outward is
experiencing the=20 delay.
Alan
G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: = "Markus=20 Vester" <markusvester@aol.com>
To: = <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= >
Sent:=20 Saturday, August 06, 2011 7:53 AM
Subject: LF: test

it seems = like the=20 RSGB reflector has been rather an absorber again...=20 73,
Markus
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01CC54DF.0D5E3620--