Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5DE3E380000BE; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 18:13:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Qpp5K-0002OL-J5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:11:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Qpp5K-0002OC-01 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:11:10 +0100 Received: from mail-ew0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qpp5H-0005ip-Fe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:11:09 +0100 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1762225ewy.16 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=hxB+wrGGlZX4JkqekUm9Y+cyVzLymf7LfSGIabHOLE4=; b=LOHjpLjcbq63tg2ZQs87YPXPWxrEgEpQ975nOI+XIUx6HPWDqcqk047giovekyIGSW bu8v7nkiRCfREoAk3jh2rRCyjyPXayWbv05ybTgqirMtK1C1LXjHhiUchnDJotZncCbp dg/TVp00pbo8Eaw3b9cpkDakd9uvYAly8inUg= Received: by 10.213.7.219 with SMTP id e27mr1116147ebe.69.1312668660517; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PcMinto (h50208.upc-h.chello.nl [62.194.50.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f1sm762868eec.30.2011.08.06.15.10.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5D042DA2B0C04AA09C5416113128574C@PcMinto> From: Minto Witteveen To: References: <4E3B1BFD.5090807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E3B2EA3.90003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <26D9EBB1476B467E9E02C10B3FACC2C8@PcMinto> <4E3D54DE.1000202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4E3D54DE.1000202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 00:10:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: CW sked on 137 friday morning? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:457852800:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d015.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d74e3dbc6f7051 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Stefan, I really cannot explain why I did not hear anything. But I will keep trying , and improve receive conditions where possible. I did eliminate two QRM generators, a Philips fluorescent lamp and an Alinco 30A switching power supply (these are really horrible, they even have a knob to adjust the ‘noise offset’ i.e. adjust the switching frequency. This should have tipped me off when I bought it…) At this moment I only hear band noise and a lot of QRN cause by lightning in Europe. The band noise is about +10 dB above the noise of the transverter and receive, tested by switching off the Miniwhip so I don’t think that sensitivity is the problem… Currently I do not have the equipment to calibrate the s-meter of the Yaesu. I will install and try Speclab to see if I can copy QRSS signals. Just a question: How do you use speclab to measure the signal level of for instance DCF39 AND the noisefloor.. By measuring both and comparing? - but then I would have to disable the ALC of the FT817?. I can try /p sometime, go out in the fields far away from man-made noise, with the miniwhip, a 12 meter fiberglass pole, a 7Ah SLA, the transverter and the 817. Regards, Minto pa3bca -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Schäfer Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 16:51 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW sked on 137 friday morning? Hello Minto, Am 05.08.2011 23:59, schrieb Minto Witteveen: > Stefan (et al), > I did listen this morning on 136.8 to see if I could copy you or any other > station, but the results were disappointing: I heard nothing. Thanks for trying anyway. Well, i was in QSO mit PA0A who must be close to you, so something must be wrong... > I have an FT817 and an FT879 as possible receivers. Both are not known for > their superb receive quality but with a 5 pole filter + additional > amplification I got them to work quite reasonable on 500 KHz. > Both rigs are very bad on LF. Very insensitive and prone to heavy > intermodulation, especially at night. > So this weekend I build a quick-and-dirty 4 MHz uptransverter with a > SA612. The Yeasu’s are much more sensitive at these frequencies. To keep > strong LF and MF stations from causing intermodulation had to add 7-pole > Chebishev filter between a PA0RDT miniwhip and the transverter. For > details see: > http://www.pa3bca.nl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23&Itemid=17 Looks good, that page. > This morning (when there was almost no man-made QRM form TV’s etc) DCF39 > was S9+30dB on the 897. On (4000+) 136.8 the noise was S 5 with the 2.4 > KHz SSB filter, and S1 with the 500 Hz filter. > Now I know that the FT’s S-meter is not very reliable, especially from > S1-S9. But between S9 and S9+40 it is “reasonably” accurate. If you use SpecLab for receiving, you directly get the signal level in dB (i.e. dB below full scale of the ADC). Then you can measure the DCF39 level and the noise floor level. Meanwhile i am getting DCF39 at 80 dB above noise in 488 mHz with the RX loop. > As far as I could find out DCF39 generates 50 KW ERP. If Stefan generates > 0.5 Watt ERP (My guestimate) Should be a few dB more ;-) > and the distance to my QTH is approximately the same, I would expect > Stefan to be 50 dB weaker. But 50 dB below DCF39 would still be above the > noise floor? So why didn’t I hear him (or for that matter, PA0A who is > closer and has 1 Watt ERP). Maybe the S meter is worse than you think, maybe. > Before I finish my 1 kW TX I first have to make sure that I will be able > to copy any other station.... :-) I had the same problems. But i immediately received DF6NM audible. So if you don't even receive PA0A, there seems to be lack of sensitivity. What happens with the noise floor if you disconnect the PA0RDT? How many dB does the noise floor decrease? Can you do /p tests? Don't expect to much activity on LF. But there are new stations coming on the band and you could be one of them and help making the band alie again. CU there :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC