Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 96F3E38000091; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:04:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QwuBq-0006ux-KM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:03:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QwuBq-0006uo-2t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:03:10 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QwuBp-0007Sd-KT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:03:10 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p7QB34U7021862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:03:07 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p7QB34vJ005982 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:03:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4E577C9B.6080807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:59:39 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <81E3EB057A864BED87E8D71A3F1E2CFC@White> <709BC73E7BD6499BA9FC97E456F77BAF@JimPC> <4E56FA5E.1010508@toya.net.pl> In-Reply-To: <4E56FA5E.1010508@toya.net.pl> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC, DF6NM in YO and 4X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:481636672:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604e4e577db73956 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Jim, Piotr, Alex, Markus, Chris, Mike, LF :-) Thanks all to this interesting observations and your reports about the LF ferrite antennas and propagated signals. I'm sure there will be more useful nights for such tests, anyway the tests have been successful, very happy about that. If QRSS-60 is possible with O copy in such conds, CW should be possible on a quiet sunday morning. Maybe we can test that later :-) Piotr, congrats to your successful reception. The QRM is stronger at home but the signal levels as well, compared to the previous antenna. So if you go outside with that ferrite antenna, you can easily gain 20 dB S/N or so. Fascinating, 800 km distance with an indoor antenna during QRN+QRM!! :-) Looking forward to further tests!! A few minutes ago, i improved my ferrite antenna a bit more: Have replaced the fixed 2.2 nF cap by (1+1+0.15+0.033)nF + a variable 47pF cap with an axis for hand adjustment + a switchable 47pF cap. This is rather compact than a 500 pF variable cap and reduces the volume of conductive materials near the ferrite rod. So this allows me now to easily tune over the entire amateur LF band. Even more useful: If i tune the variable cap to 137.7 kHz and just switch the fixed cap, i come out at 136.5 kHz (CW!) without the need to further adjustments. Excellent, isn't it? :-)) The high-Z preamp is still an open project but soon i have it completed. What a fun! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 26.08.2011 03:43, schrieb Piotr Mlynarski: > James Moritz pisze: >> Dear Stefan, Markus, LF Group, >> >> A screenshot of DK7FC and DF6NM received in IO91VR between 2230 and >> 0000utc, with 84mHz FFT resolution, and using the ferrite rod >> antenna. DK7FC seems to be about 6dB stronger than DF6NM here, on >> average. But not really a very good night for testing receive >> antennas - the QRN level is so high that the proverbial piece of wet >> string would be just as good! >> >> Cheers, Jim Moritz >> 73 de M0BMU > > Dear Markus, Stefan, Jim, LF > > Maybe this night is not a very good one for testing different rx > antennae according to Jim observations , nevertheless, some of us > decided to do it ... :) > Enclosed, there is a SL capture from my night 'experiments' - at > first, i have used my air loop antenna ( 1 sq. meter, 11t ) About > 2:25 a.m. local time I disconnected my air loop while SL was running > , then, i reconnected SDR-IQ to my ferrite-rod antenna which was > inside the room !!! > ( i only managed to raise it some 40-50 cm above the floor) and to my > real amusement i could still copy Markus DF6NM, also Stefan, though i > got some constant qrm line almost > on Stefan.. 172 freq i did not play with brightness/contrast etc.. > just to see how the noise changes. > Anyway, i am very happy - it is my first positive observation of a > distant amateur signal on 136 kHz band ( if i have correct data Stefan > grid-loc is JN49IK, Markus JN59NK so this makes > 800 and 640 km , respectively) using ferrite rod antenna ( described > in earlier mails). As an amplifier i have used Roelof, PA0RDT > miniwhip circuit , simply > using as a high Z-input the LC parallel network. > > > 73, Piotr, sq7mpj > > qth: Lodz /jo91rs/