Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 244AA380000BC; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:09:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QuVM4-0002c2-EZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:07:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QuVLz-0002bt-VB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:07:43 +0100 Received: from mailt.toya.net.pl ([217.113.224.9] ident=postfix) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QuVLx-0001UT-Cp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:07:43 +0100 Received: from mail.toya.net.pl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2F6200006A6 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 715F5200006BF; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [10.3.153.39]) (Authenticated sender: unimlyn@toya.net.pl) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC2CC200006A6 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E4EC28A.80708@toya.net.pl> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:38 +0200 From: Piotr Mlynarski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7.0.1.0.1.20110819095835.01ba53e8@xtra.co.nz> <4E4D96F0.6050409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313740427.69106.YahooMailNeo@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1313740947.33597.YahooMailNeo@web111915.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E4E220A.7070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4E4E220A.7070706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite Receive Antennas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:375803456:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584e4ec2e7530a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Sch=E4fer pisze: > > DCF39 is about 500 km distant to you. You should receive it some 10 dB=20 > better as you did. This is probably caused by local QRM. > What is the gain of your amp stage? > And what is the Q of the antenna's LC circuit? > BTW this small antenna is good to find a quiet place in the local=20 > region and help to find the location of local QRM sources. So once one=20 > has found the quietest place in the garden, a bigger loop may be=20 > instelled there... > I have some problems with the dynamic range of my soundcard which is=20 > 120 dB in 1 Hz. Not bad but DCF39 comes in at up to 97 dB and if i=20 > want to stay 15 dB above the soundcards noise (in the passband) it=20 > becomes critical. > > I saw that there are big differences between different capacitor=20 > types. Replacing a standard foil cap by a styroflex cap increased the=20 > Q from 130 to 480! I took a cheap variable cap (100 pF) with a foil=20 > dielectricum to resonate the antenna and saw that Q decreases with=20 > increasing C of this small cap. The styroflex type is 2.2 nF. Then i=20 > found a 47 pF silver plated varable cap with air dielectricum which=20 > even has a 6mm axis. Now i think about using this cap and some=20 > switches and fixed caps (47 pF, 100 pF, 220 pF) for resonating... > > About the winding on my antenna: I stopped optimising after getting=20 > that Q of 486 at 55 turns but actually it could be useful to further=20 > increase the number of turns as long as the Q doesn't decrease to=20 > much. Have to do some tests with various C values and see how the Q=20 > changes as a function of frequency. More turns would result in a=20 > higher output voltage. Furthermore i would get a wider range of=20 > frequency variation by that small 47 pF varicap. The current Z of my=20 > LC circuit is just about 500 Ohm... > > Will you further optimise your system and try to receive some DX=20 > signals with it or was it just a test? :-) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > Hi Stefan, LF the rx setup mentioned in my previous mail has been built yesterday=20 afternoon/evening so it definitely needs improvements/rearrangements etc= .. first of all i must raise the ferrite from the floor , find more=20 suitable place an so on.. the voltage gain of the buffer/amplifier stage=20 is abt 27 dB the cap in LC consists of three parallel mica capacitors of nominaly 560=20 pf each + 500 pf air variable i do not have a VNA at hand so in fact no serious measurements have been=20 made. Of course, i will make further experiments and if i catch any distant signal, sure, will announce here.. :) 73, Piotr, sq7mpj qth: Lodz/jo91rs/