Message-ID: <4E4C2803.40100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:43:47 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto>	 <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto>	 <4E480E02.9020706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <938BF599006244949F6CDDB5BA91F347@PcMinto> <4E482FBD.7030402@freenet.de>	 <4E484183.9090805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E494A57.90105@freenet.de>	 <4E4956DA.1060201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E49643E.5090708@freenet.de>	 <4E496FF9.4040608@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <0A4ED65EC3B244A3BD0DAD6ACFF43793@JimPC>	 <4E4A5597.4070709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <3746D901368F4C139E414F9110153EEE@JimPC>	 <4E4A9A1F.2060600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <1B55B625C3CD4D529EC361D9C5D79D96@JimPC>	 <4E4AD4C8.8000509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <4E4AEF31.5010306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <1FF2FAD9854F4890A338A9F862D93FE9@JimPC>	 <8CE2AD319756ED7-1C20-14370@Webmail-m104.sysops.aol.com>	 <4E4BC177.6050902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>	 <001f01cc5cf9$4b734780$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>	 <DC784DD1-7ADD-4772-A008-D061D294F247@numeo.fr> <1313610221.1650.6.camel@gerhard-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <1313610221.1650.6.camel@gerhard-desktop>
Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a4e4c282a6023
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Thank you Gerhard.

Yes, i know about Ossis signal. I have forgotten to look for it during=20
my tests but i have done a recording and could re-process it. But Ossi=20
hasn't been QRV during that time, i just saw on my grabber ;-)
Anyway, Mal is about twice as far and i heared him so i am almost sure=20
that i would see Ossi in QRSS-60 :-) A CW test signal would have been=20
useful.

There will be enough chances in the near future, not just doing tests=20
but real QSOs, i hope so.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 17.08.2011 21:43, schrieb Gerhard Hickl:
> John, Stefan, LF!
>
> Not sure if all of you have noticed, but Ossi, OE5ODL is providing such
> a signal nearly all the time around 137775.
>
> It would be ideally suited for Stefan because it's very well outside th=
e
> so called "Near-field" and thus giving "true" results.
>
> Stefan, if you need such a signal for test purposes just get in touch
> with Ossi, I'm sure he will be glad to assist.
>
> 73
> OE3GHB
> Gerhard
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 17.08.2011, 19:09 +0200 schrieb John Rabson:
>   =20
>> Mal,
>>
>>
>> It's called =E2=80=9Cstepwise refinement=E2=80=9D. Stefan's experiment=
s need a steady
>> signal of known characteristics that is always there. He can use that
>>   signal to establish how well (or otherwise) his new configuration
>> works.
>>
>>
>> It is not easy to do these things if you  have to depend on signals
>> which may not always be there.
>>
>>
>> When you have made sufficient improvements, it is then a good time to
>> go looking for weaker signals.
>>
>>
>> John F5VLF
>>
>> On 17 Aug 2011, at 18:18CEST, mal hamilton wrote:
>>
>>     =20
>>> Stefan
>>> But what sort of strength do you Receive weak Radio Amateur signals.
>>> That is the real test
>>> Commercial radio stations a different matter with their Megawatts
>>> de mal/g3kev
>>>       =20
>>
>>     =20
>
>   =20