Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3ABB3380000C7; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:40:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QtQQJ-00064v-8m for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:39:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QtQQI-00064m-N8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:39:42 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QtQQH-0005NC-Hl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:39:42 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p7GKdeBg003570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:39:40 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p7GKdeSp030817 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:39:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4E4AD4C8.8000509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:36:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto> <4E47FFE9.10100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> <4E480E02.9020706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <938BF599006244949F6CDDB5BA91F347@PcMinto> <4E482FBD.7030402@freenet.de> <4E484183.9090805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E494A57.90105@freenet.de> <4E4956DA.1060201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E49643E.5090708@freenet.de> <4E496FF9.4040608@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0A4ED65EC3B244A3BD0DAD6ACFF43793@JimPC> <4E4A5597.4070709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3746D901368F4C139E414F9110153EEE@JimPC> <4E4A9A1F.2060600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1B55B625C3CD4D529EC361D9C5D79D96@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <1B55B625C3CD4D529EC361D9C5D79D96@JimPC> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:471101088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410b4e4ad5d04f38 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Jim, LF, I'll try to go on as fast as the distributor and ebay did ;-) So this is the current situation: Decided to use the 2x7 bundle. The cross section area of 7 pcs. just lokks better :-) Also the complete stick is much more handy and robust. Markus/DF6NM gave me the hint to overlap the inner rod by 50%. So i intentionally broke one rod and put the 2 halfs to the inner ends. One complete one is now in the inner center. See: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/ferrite%20antenna%20parts.JPG I took a simple bonding tape to isolate the rods from each other. The whole arrangement was fixed by bonding tape and put into a stable and very proper PVC tube with 2.5 mm thickness, making the rod very robust and give some distance between winding and ferrite (just as in the magic antenna article ;-) ). Ther was even some place to add a bit of that transport foil with the air bubbles inside, you know ;-) Perhaps this will be some kind of shock protection (hopefully never needed) and fixed the rods inside the tube. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/inside.JPG Now the outer dimensiona are 285 mm x 33 mm. As a first test i wound a simple wire arround the rod, 22 turns. Resonance C is 11.2 nF and f res = 137,1 kHz. Q = 100 (unloaded). During the measurement i was irritated by a strange peak near 137.7 kHz which was my own transmission during that time ;-) So L must be 120 uH. Not so much... Will go on now using the Litz wire and start with about 40 turns and see what comes out. Then i go for 60 turns, maybe 80 if Q is still rising. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 16.08.2011 19:01, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Stefan, LF Group, > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> The 20 mV is the peak level (thus mVp ;-) ) while the mentioned 100 >> uV is rms. > > OK - so that makes your RX noise level 3dB lower, and gives you 3dB > more margin, which is good! > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU