Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7C19638000087; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:12:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QsjqK-0002W5-Tw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:11:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QsjqK-0002Vw-Fh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:11:44 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QsjqJ-0005ns-19 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:11:44 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p7ENBgn1032043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:11:42 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p7ENBf0G011131 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:11:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4E48556B.7030906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:08:27 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto> <4E47FFE9.10100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> <4E480E02.9020706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <938BF599006244949F6CDDB5BA91F347@PcMinto> <4E482FBD.7030402@freenet.de> <4E484183.9090805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Ferrite RX antennas Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000004080201010802060203" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:367411040:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41194e4856797cbd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000004080201010802060203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Interesting! Can anyone of the experts comment on this concept? After scrolling down through pages of text i just found a few photos. The mechanical concept is clear. But the author appears almost esoteric to me, like a guru of that antenna, "_*The best compact AM antenna in the world - ever!" *_So it is said that 20 ferrite rods in that arrangement perform 20 dB better than a single rod. OK, but how well performs such a signgle rod? 20 dB is maybe not enough, compared to a well designed single turn loop, which i have now. My goal is always LF/137, not MF BCD stations or so. The advantage of the ferrite solution, if sensitivity is sufficient to be well above the noise on a quiet day, would be to be completely free in all /p sesions (without a car). Would it be possible to reasonable simulate that antenna (not an accurate model but rather an estimation)? 73, Stefan/DK7FC _* *_Am 15.08.2011 00:04, schrieb Roelof Bakker: > Hello all, > > If you have time to read it all, this might be interesting: > > http://www.gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm > > or Google for Ferrite Sleeve Loop. > > 73, > Roelof, pa0rdt --------------000004080201010802060203 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id p7ENBgn1032043 Interesting!

Can anyone of the experts comment on this concept?

After scrolling down through pages of text i just found a few photos. The mechanical concept is clear.
But the author appears almost esoteric to me, like a guru of that antenna,=C2=A0 "The best compact AM antenna in the world - ev= er!"

So it is said that 20 ferrite rods in that arrangement perform 20 dB better than a single rod. OK, but how well performs such a signgle rod? 20 dB is maybe not enough, compared to a well designed single turn loop, which i have now.=C2=A0 My goal is always LF/137, not M= F BCD stations or so. The advantage of the ferrite solution, if sensitivity is sufficient to be well above the noise on a quiet day, would be to be completely free in all /p sesions (without a car).

Would it be possible to reasonable simulate that antenna (not an accurate model but rather an estimation)?

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 15.08.2011 00:04, schrieb Roelof Bakker:
Hello all,

If you have time to read it all, this might be interesting:

http://www.gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm

or Google for Ferrite Sleeve Loop.

73,
Roelof, pa0rdt
--------------000004080201010802060203--