Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5101F3800009D; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:07:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Qsf5U-0000cs-4i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:07:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Qsf5T-0000cj-IV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:07:03 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qsf5S-0000i1-3Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:07:03 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p7EI71EL024430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:07:01 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p7EI6x2b005569 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:06:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4E480E02.9020706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:03:46 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <68BE37BD69E54DEE89CEBA8E30E9B94E@PcMinto> <4E47FFE9.10100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> In-Reply-To: <3ED8E5422F1F45DBB8186E9D9870AD63@PcMinto> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137 grabbers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030109060304070805070305" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:398536672:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b4e480efa7827 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030109060304070805070305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id p7EI71EL024430 Minto, Daniele, @Daniele: Nice to read you also want to join in on LF! BTW VLF is not=20 forgotten here, i want to come back in September. But want to have the=20 LF system ready for the DX season and wat for lower QRN on the Dreamers=20 Band... You don't have a licence and cannot TX? Wouldn't it be worth to learn=20 for a licence for that reason? :-) And have you done further tests on sferics and so on your remote VLF=20 QTH? Any news? Just got re-fascinated by John/F5VLF about the earth antenna stuff and=20 want to do more experiments on that antenna again but LF improvements=20 are very time consuming! But i have holidays now :-))) I am curious how=20 the earth antenna performs as a RX antenna on 137 kHz (directional=20 pattern and gain and noise). As a TX antenna i will be to lossy i think=20 and its not worth the effort carrying 100s of kg of batteries on the=20 hill for doing some CQ calls that are not answered.... @Minto: Am 14.08.2011 19:33, schrieb Minto Witteveen: > > Above 10 MHz the gain drops off rapidly, it is nearly useless at 14=20 > MHz. a -77 type would be much worse there I think. > Sure. I just talked about LF now. I read the -43 type is suitable for=20 40...400 MHz, at least this is said in the catalog... > > As for the Q: I did a comparison between an FT50-43 and a 14 mm 4C6=20 > (for my 137 KHz low-pass filter, see my website). The Q of the FT50-43=20 > coil was abt 50, the 4C6 =E2=80=93 with a lower Al - was 140 !! > Interesting! 140 at which L? I am searching for ferrite cores to achieve=20 a high Q on LF, in the range of 100...1000uH. Where can i get these=20 cores? At RS? Where do you buy them? They are usually samller, cheaper=20 and easier to handle than pot cores. BTW what do you think about a ferrite RX antenna for LF? Now i'm opening=20 an older discussion i expect ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------030109060304070805070305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id p7EI71EL024430 Minto, Daniele,

@Daniele: Nice to read you also want to join in on LF! BTW VLF is not forgotten here, i want to come back in September. But want to have the LF system ready for the DX season and wat for lower QRN on the Dreamers Band...
You don't have a licence and cannot TX? Wouldn't it be worth to learn for a licence for that reason? :-)
And have you done further tests on sferics and so on your remote VLF QTH? Any news?
Just got re-fascinated by John/F5VLF about the earth antenna stuff and want to do more experiments on that antenna again but LF improvements are very time consuming! But i have holidays now :-))) I am curious how the earth antenna performs as a RX antenna on 137 kHz (directional pattern and gain and noise). As a TX antenna i will be to lossy i think and its not worth the effort carrying 100s of kg of batteries on the hill for doing some CQ calls that are not answered....

@Minto:
Am 14.08.2011 19:33, schrieb Minto Witteveen:

Above 10 MHz the gain drops off rapidly, it is nearly useless at 14 MHz. a -77 type would be much worse there I think.

Sure. I just talked about LF now. I read the -43 type is suitable for 40...400 MHz, at least this is said in the catalog...

As for the Q: I did a comparison between an FT50-43 and a 14 mm 4C6 (for my 137 KHz low-pass filter, see my website). The Q of the FT50-43 coil was abt 50, the 4C6 =E2=80=93 with a lower Al - was 140 = !!

Interesting! 140 at which L? I am searching for ferrite cores to achieve a high Q on LF, in the range of 100...1000uH. Where can i get these cores? At RS? Where do you buy them? They are usually samller, cheaper and easier to handle than pot cores.

BTW what do you think about a ferrite RX antenna for LF? Now i'm opening an older discussion i expect ;-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


--------------030109060304070805070305--