Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9A9A238000089; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:03:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QyjUO-0003mv-Ry for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:01:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QyjUN-0003mm-OW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:01:51 +0100 Received: from nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.198]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QyjUL-0004Hm-7a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:01:51 +0100 Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Aug 2011 12:01:41 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.17] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Aug 2011 12:01:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Aug 2011 12:01:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 251423.46732.bm@omp1017.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 62443 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Aug 2011 12:01:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1314792100; bh=U/BByc2RmZcnA2ZMq9QHNsQmO4t5hPGtv5gwmgebtQM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qwUciVm6TiuD3mvu7kWoZgQLfhK554pEvDuP+/vdx2QQhTwkknzS8P7xeXl82j7zP7yDv8otUEQgdLC1sx4znjTTOWUMNJWNmKcJGdy+jom3OtuXDFWvuVN8hrtmDJx14Zef9rFf1Ea8zXmV6afvyoECpk5UE0VKqeY/ZeRHf2k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=InIboDBNh4LACaWdPDFMoHZg6P1vpLlh/sFziStO725owdYb3svzJpaWw/1k7714lhVQ0ezOf/HURYoeEMVN1wKHOi//ApkXNZebr94W6WJscVEpSSsFyBo8mppzOULdgjiS7iv4rXAnmZC65MrCDDnI6GzLwnNTo3kVWSa/lo8=; X-YMail-OSG: wyliiKwVM1k5wr5zoV85CrzQ6B.FeiyvXQX8RFVAw_DOOEk y8Klub9epBGac46Dv69f_xF3BozNVOnfQe.1IrCswy2LcALgjXoMqU30n4DQ yg5KLIc99icUCIv9EryjZXNqwixGzndmBZDgCbrFkn97uWEDoht92e2bMiZQ .7I8mPUOmIGwQAesjh2LZHdGRetIEDaUpJFkE21E3uTOzSdqx1bf8qzTb2He QF0sZ8jzAFoWUjbt2gvvNha.uUoA2b2IdxcQwtqKWxabRBu4w6gUTv_TPMJ0 CcoLARbwmfHJnnr5yaVEJk.lsFChb2OMyk2RJX4Mnf0rkOe5CfNoBcHKbf9e fdImVlyQv2ywhpUABZcun28bbdsSNx7hQy9ZDupU4gE_OkpZt Received: from [151.99.187.181] by web111911.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:01:40 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.315625 References: <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4379ED2AAB4@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <4DF9EFD1.5010208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1313780109.51443.YahooMailNeo@web111907.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <9CD1E11E8BC9402CB4AECECAC4088443@JimPC> <1314394178.5030.YahooMailNeo@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1314641183.5605.YahooMailNeo@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CBC9A.5020900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1314705226.37125.YahooMailNeo@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CF192.3040905@legal-medicine.de> <1314715132.88047.YahooMailNeo@web111917.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5CFEEF.6050803@legal-medicine.de> Message-ID: <1314792100.61830.YahooMailNeo@web111911.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <4E5CFEEF.6050803@legal-medicine.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TINY_FONT=1.425 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-139511897-1314792100=:61830" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:451219360:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m023.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1484e5e23230c1c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-139511897-1314792100=:61830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0=0AHi Peter, LF,=0A=A0=0Ais a specific type of wire recommended (or not = recommended) for the coil?=0A=A0=0ABest regards=0ADaniele=0A=A0=0A=0AFrom: = pws =0ATo: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0ASent: Tues= day, August 30, 2011 5:17 PM=0ASubject: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas?= =0A=0AHi again Daniele,=0A=0AI forgot some words about shielding.=0A=0ADo n= ot use solid sheet. I just built a small receiver for rtty at 147 kHz for w= eather report reception when sailing. Using a fine looking u-shaped copper = shield the signal went down of some 10 dB even if spaced 4 cm apart from th= e rod. And it did not improve the SNR considerably.=0A=0AUsing an envelope = from old SCSI flatline soldered together only at one side the SNR went up o= f >10 dB inside the house. The effect is incredible. My guess is that Eddy = currents are responsible for this. So if possible shield your ferrite anten= na coil by a "feathered", comb-like structure with multiple conductors runn= ing in parallel around the rod. They may overlap some cm if isolated. And i= n contrast to solid shielding distance doesn't matter.=0A=0APeter, df3lp --0-139511897-1314792100=:61830 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Hi Peter, LF,=
 
is a specific type of wire recommended (or not recommended) for t= he coil?
 
Best regards<= /div>
Daniele
 

From:= pws <pws@legal-medicine.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 5:17 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Ferrite wide= band antennas?

Hi again Daniele,

I forgot some words a= bout shielding.

Do not use solid sheet. I just built a small receive= r for rtty at 147 kHz for weather report reception when sailing. Using a fi= ne looking u-shaped copper shield the signal went down of some 10 dB even i= f spaced 4 cm apart from the rod. And it did not improve the SNR considerably.
<= BR>Using an envelope from old SCSI flatline soldered together only at one s= ide the SNR went up of >10 dB inside the house. The effect is incredible= . My guess is that Eddy currents are responsible for this. So if possible s= hield your ferrite antenna coil by a "feathered", comb-like structure with = multiple conductors running in parallel around the rod. They may overlap so= me cm if isolated. And in contrast to solid shielding distance doesn't matt= er.

Peter, df3lp



--0-139511897-1314792100=:61830--