Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2937D3800008C; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 14:57:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ql3qK-0006jF-Dh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:56:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ql3qJ-0006j6-DJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:55:59 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129] helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ql3qH-0001vl-18 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:55:59 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: B6CFF1380B5.AA1B8 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CFF1380B5 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB-N1.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub-n1.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.11]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F790F3862 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.11.13]) by ICTS-S-HUB-N1.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.9.11]) with mapi; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:55:44 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:51:44 +0200 Thread-Topic: LF: DL6NN on 137 Thread-Index: AcxKFyCurTJV0wafQoy6ufKBf/YkNQAG5sQK Message-ID: References: <4E29AB51.1040401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E29ADE8.6060706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E29BC6E.8030500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8486B5CCE6EA4804B9957C9C25CEE702@PcMinto> <001101cc4912$8938c5e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>,<3BEB06475E9047058E91633D4C919360@PcMinto> In-Reply-To: <3BEB06475E9047058E91633D4C919360@PcMinto> Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl-BE Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: RE: LF: DL6NN on 137 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:470039264:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca4e2c6b0e3f3a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Minto, I was active on 136kHz with a similar antenna (15m high, 25m long "lazy-L" = antenna) and in addition the losses were very high (abt. 130-160 Ohm). Despite that I managed to work distances up to 1600km in regular CW (best D= X =3D OH1TN). So don't dispair. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens Minto Witteveen [minto.witteveen@gmail.com] Verzonden: zondag 24 juli 2011 17:26 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: DL6NN on 137 Hi Mal, 1 KW should be enough for a regular CW QSO I suppose. But on the other hand: my antenna efficiency is very low. I did some calculations with MMANA-GAL and the radiation resistance of my 30 mtr long end-fed antenna is only 0.019 Ohm=85 And there is no simple way to improve (lengthen or make it higher). Measurement with my AIM4170 Antenna Analyzer shows a total antenna system impedance of 150 Ohms at 136 KHz. So the efficiency is only 0.019/150 =3D 127x10^-6. This means that with 1 KW output the ERP is only 0.13 Watt. I hope it is enough.. Kind regards, Minto pa3bca -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse -----Original Message----- From: mal hamilton Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 10:28 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Re: DL6NN on 137 Hi Minto Let me know when you are QRV for a QSO on 137. CW will be satisfactory for both ends with our power and mine 73 es gl de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Minto Witteveen" To: Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 10:00 PM Subject: LF: Re: DL6NN on 137 > Well, I am all for it.. > > Now that we (PA) are kicked off of 500 KHz (again!) I needed another > challenge. So 136 KHz it is. > > I have already built a PA for 136. My design is for > 1KW, I have only > tested it at 650 Watt as my current power supply cannot handle more, and the > same goes for my dummy load. > > But I do have a 50 Volt 1.2 KW supply that should do the trick. > > I do not think QRP is an option on 137 KHz - especially with my antenna (Mal > wil probably concur :-) ) > > Next step is building a variometer (3.5 to 4 mH), and the mixer/driver so I > can use my ft817 like in the 500 KHz setup. > > Don=92t expect met to appear on 136 any time real soon however, unformtunately > I do not have much time at the moment to complete the project. My target is > the end of August. > > > > For those interested: I have created a quick and dirty webpage with some > info abt my experiment: > > http://www.pa3bca.nl/index.php?option=3Dcom_content&view=3Darticle&id=3D22&= Itemid=3D 16 > > > > Regards, > > Minto pa3bca > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > >From: Stefan Sch=E4fer > > >Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 20:07 > > >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > >Subject: Re: LF: Re: DL6NN on 137 > > >He seems to be new on the band. No other stations visible in the moment. > > >Surely it would be a positive impulse if new stations could get some > > >QSOs. This could start a positive spiral of activity. It's up to us... > > >DL6NN in JO30VC, OM Lutz. 99km distant to me, 250km to DF6NM. > > >73, Stefan/DK7FC, still in QSO > >=