Message-ID: <4E294BFF.4030700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:07:59 +0200
From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?=
 <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4E292DA4.3090507@telus.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E292DA4.3090507@telus.net>
Subject: Re: LF: Mitigation of =?windows-1252?Q?50=9660_Hz_power_li?=
 =?windows-1252?Q?ne_interference=2Cin_geophysical_data?=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad04e294c3c6e94
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Hi Scott,

Tnx for this interesting and up to date paper. Just read the=20
introduction. It seems they read the LF reflectror and built their RX=20
system like we do ;-) And they seem to use sililar technique, no special=20
parts that cannot be achieved or payed by amateurs. Maybe they even use=20
SpecLab, like in India, at least alternatively. Well, Stanford is in=20
west US and so very far away. They cannot conjure so probably it makes=20
no sense to try to get in contact to them. Can you imagine they could be=20
interested in a common project? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 22.07.2011 09:58, schrieb Scott Tilley:
> Hi All
>
> He's a VERY interesting paper on something we can all relate to.
>
> "Mitigation of 50=9660 Hz power line interference,in geophysical data"
> http://vlf.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/2010-26.pdf
>
> Has anyone explored these ideas in amateur work?
>
> 73 Scott
> VE7TIL
> http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
>