Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2A97738000089; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:23:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Qj7QQ-0001MI-2l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:21:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Qj7QP-0001M9-9L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:21:13 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qj7QO-00027v-Rd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:21:13 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p6JALB8F009303 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:21:11 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6JALA3s002060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:21:11 +0200 Received: from [129.206.205.203] (vpn205-203.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.205.203]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p6JAL9Dg003981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:21:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4E255A9B.8090502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:21:15 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E2410BC.7070405@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E2452BC.5050408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: TX converter for 137 kHz, help needed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:497582368:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60894e255b133bcf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Tnx Roelof and Jim for help and comments! Jim, some questions: Am 18.07.2011 19:17, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Stefan, LF Group, > >> So what is missed in my circuit is the allpass network that makes a 90 >> deg delay of the input signal. > > ...Unless the software generates I/Q outputs from the sound card L/R > stereo outputs. Why? The design Andy shows has a mono audio input. This is what i am searching for :-) > Scale the values of either R or C proportional to the inverse of the > centre frequency (or both - it is 1/RC time constant you need to > scale). Yo might find faster op-amps neccessary at high audio > frequencies. OK, i did that for a center frequency of 12 kHz but the result was poor. Then is systematically played with the values and found two pairs of 1n/5k8 and 15n/2k27 which showed at least 47 dB image rejection in the LF band, peaking at -76 dB at 12.55 kHz, which will be a theoretical value of course. I'm going to try these values in a practical circuit and see what comes out. A spectrum analyzer is available at work so i can report about the results, hopefully this week. > The propagation delay adds an error to the phase shift, causing > imperfect cancellation of the unwanted sideband, so it helps if the > propagation delay is small > > 4000 series CMOS is a bit slow really - I have used a 74HC4052 in an > I/Q receiver, which works quite well at 136k. OK, understood. So i will use a 74HC4052, a 74HC74 and LM358 which all are available at a local store here, just 1km away (VLF near field ;-) )... Tnx agn es 73, Stefan/DK7FC