Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 363D0380002A8; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:37:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QWpwN-0007qv-GW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QWpwM-0007qm-Eh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:26 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.129] helo=cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QWpwJ-0005lv-GG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:26 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 7A3B5138691.A97EC X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3B5138691 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:09:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB-N4.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub-n4.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.14]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476CA31E702 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:09:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.11.13]) by ICTS-S-HUB-N4.luna.kuleuven.be ([10.112.9.14]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:09:41 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:09:42 +0200 Thread-Topic: LF RX loop Thread-Index: AcwrWcch8I8n2YTmRmKnncJIYRbnhgAAQm3P Message-ID: References: <4DF8A827.9070106@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4DF8A827.9070106@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl-BE Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: RE: LF RX loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:387619200:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60574df8b59f32da X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, based on 470nF and 137kHz the inductance is only 0.47uH (what means XL =3D = 0.4 Ohm). As Q =3D XL/R for a Q =3D 8 the loss resistance is 0.05 Ohm. This seems acceptable to me. Due to the very low XL it will be hard to get = a high Q (eg. for Q =3D 100 you would need to reduce the losses to 0.004 Oh= m. The low DCF39 signal is probabaly caused by the low Q. I think the best way to get a better Q is to use a multi turn loop. About nulling the loop: multipath can be the cause of poor nulling, but I h= ave experienced that the main reason is that the loop also acts a bit as a = electrical antenna, with a omnidirectional pattern ruins the null's. Best w= ay to avoid this is electrical shielding of the loop. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens Stefan Sch=E4fer [schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] Verzonden: woensdag 15 juni 2011 14:40 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: LF: LF RX loop LF, Some questions about RX loops for LF. Yesterday i found a shortcut between my loop ends. Thus i haven't found a resonance when varying the C. It is a single turn circular loop using copper tube with 10mm diameter (about 1m). I calculated the L with a formula of ON7YDs LF info pages and found a C of about 470 nF which agreed very well. It was easily possible to resonate the loop with an induced signal by a smaller loop connected to my VFO and measuring the C volatage with an oscilloscope. I found the Q of the loop is just 8! Is this normal? Which Q do others achieve, with a similar antenna for 137 kHz? I'm using PP capacitors which should be well suitable (WIMA MKP10) http://www.wima.de/EN/WIMA_MKP_10.pdf It is fascinating to null out s signal, which i have done the first time now. I can reduce the signal of DCF39 by 25 dB by turning the loop. I assume there are different paths the signal comes from, this is why i cannot eliminate it completely, right? I used a high mu toroid (ferroxube, blue material) to transform the primary side (=3Dthe loop) to 50 Ohm. I have done this by varying the secondary turn number until i achieved a maximum voltage at a 50 Ohm load at a given input signal. The secondary number is now about 25 turns. The resonance frequency is not affected by the load at the output of the transformer. Now DCF39 appears at up to 45 dB above noise in 3 Hz which. But it should be at least 20 dB higher i think. Furthermore the background noise does not change at all when i connect or disconnect the antenna. Thus i think it makes sense to build a preamp. I found a suitable circuit on the pdf of Jim/M0BMUs loop article which looks well for me. Looking forward to this amp performance! Is it important to terminate the loops transformer output with a 50 Ohm load in that case? On an oscilloscope i found that the level of DCF39 is higher when having no R connected to the output but the waveform looks much better / cleaner! I'm optimistic to get much proper reception of UK and PA and HB9 CW signals on 137 soon, when beeing outside the city, steering the LF TX by the 70cm link :-) Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC=