Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 29CB03800011A; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:48:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QWw2c-0001HC-U6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:46:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QWw2c-0001H3-Er for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:46:18 +0100 Received: from mail-pz0-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QWw2Z-0004rs-8I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:46:18 +0100 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so861892pzk.16 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qSTHJTD7Jgl52ehIMsXLX3bzUuErxBdOkxHY7gOftQo=; b=pwJ/RFjEzYeI6ACCRnal23cM6xR0c58uL6I3NXwXyujfZ8cUGkPu8blY6qumDqJ3Av cGOvvCLRj9VizNehKKcYoieG5PLGu1AWYG5HtCr6pmIDy5XIQmdDNtbT9xDDp4KPW+jk gADHIL5qjRzikFNoY7ssTIIRwY0cJfu3Duwlg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TLc7zDNQqatTeUB+rm/1PVSjK3R8vx87uNAT4WAn3MDiBsti0sPXqs+8o53D9Rc3KJ /o821eum+ByspRpNBul1tzah6pRzzn2Za+5so/EyOjCV5ijoOYoxdx7kbwYA9j2UYZME ML4xY4uLB76V0FzYC9TMMOx1aaiLhkf2yf+Wc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.62.8 with SMTP id p8mr50854wfk.328.1308167168678; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.132.17 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <005401cc2b83$0d0cbaf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:46:08 +0100 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: SPAM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173fed8e655ab504a5c567d0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:502296992:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m204.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad44df90c8037c6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0015173fed8e655ab504a5c567d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mal has a genuine point and is not criticizing Alberto. Alberto's emails do seem to get treated as SPAM frequently by email programmes, in my case by Gmail which is usually excellent at filtering genuine SPAM. His contribution is not in question at all, just why his emails automatically get routed as SPAM when they are clearly not. Does anyone know why this might be as I am sure Mal and I are not alone with this problem? I don't have problems with any other emails sent to this group by others. 73s Roger G3XBM On 15 June 2011 19:51, Graham wrote: > Alberto has contributed a considerable amount of time and effort > to the radio community ... > > I seem to remember a screaming fit when a real spam event took > place some time ago > > the two seem to contradict > > *From:* mal hamilton > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2011 6:38 PM > *To:* rsgb > *Subject:* LF: SPAM > > Recent msg fm Alberto scores a high count of SPAM points > g3kev > > > > -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ --0015173fed8e655ab504a5c567d0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mal has a genuine point and is not criticizing Alberto.

Alberto'= s emails do seem to get treated as SPAM frequently by email programmes, in = my case by Gmail which is usually excellent at filtering genuine SPAM.

His contribution is not in question at all, just why his emails automat= ically get routed as SPAM when they are clearly not. Does anyone know why t= his might be as I am sure Mal and I are not alone with this problem?

I don't have problems with any other emails sent to this group by o= thers.

73s
Roger G3XBM



= On 15 June 2011 19:51, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
Alberto=A0 has=A0 contributed=A0 a=A0= =20 considerable=A0 amount=A0 of=A0 time and=A0 effort to the=A0=20 radio=A0 community ...
=A0
I seem to=A0 remember a screaming=A0= =20 fit=A0 when a=A0 real=A0 spam event=A0 took=A0 place=A0 some=20 time ago
=A0
the=A0 two=A0 seem to=A0 contradict=20 =A0

Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 6:38 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: SPAM

Recent msg fm Alberto scores a high count of SPAM= =20 points
g3kev
=A0





--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/http://www.g3xbm.co.u= k
http://www.= youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

--0015173fed8e655ab504a5c567d0--