Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5AECD38000088; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QXAx7-0003ug-9M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:41:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QXAx6-0003uX-PW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:41:36 +0100 Received: from mail-gy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.160.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QXAx4-0004dS-55 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:41:36 +0100 Received: by gye5 with SMTP id 5so413513gye.16 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:41:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=niQ6QWoC8h3IyUn3CvQHkeJZOUGkocOkNXe1PXLR5vo=; b=Uuqf8iBZf9YyTiMu8cHqFWGf7tLsIRUNdrNp5w51xcBQ/QZ1czwTMcjjL3Lg+ymUhn YsWR9Eg6odPl30mz/Yz6V7mksTUh2AXhmhQagd6vNhGYjj073auLHMfFqLRguh7Gzcbg nzlh5Qo7xANNU7nOrZVCb6gxZsdcITd6Mb0Ng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YJ6Z25SXxx1Jbe0q+5UZ7RxtbICYSj6yVIUFG7r9ssDSecojHlE8LHqj2zAELmTDV+ umnJViGF7HoCUI0EneUUZ3MwV9g0QmYulNhoe5GWl25O02ZolzSxu412jXoilWL7Jm7C 36EapKE/CzjXo14KuGzSJWqxchoQsBGTpJMLk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.2.25 with SMTP id e25mr939261ani.28.1308224487487; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.137.5 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:41:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1DEEAA49EBA04DFC84153152C06B7B6A@IBM7FFA209F07C> References: <4DF9E12E.3020405@talktalk.net> <1DEEAA49EBA04DFC84153152C06B7B6A@IBM7FFA209F07C> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:41:27 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KP-7ax5MHGpTKkyHsNjtEUh007I Message-ID: From: Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e2a87dcf6f504a5d2bfd3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:495429152:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m254.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca4df9ec5b1e90 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0016368e2a87dcf6f504a5d2bfd3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Chris, Eddie & All, I have also given this/these subjects some thought & I have been seriously tempted to make a similar statement as Chris has just posted. As interesting they may be for the followers, this forum "LF" is not the place for these discussions. There are dedicated forums for these topics with dedicated followers & that is where the postings should be made. I subscribe to several other forums in the fields of VLF & sub 9kHz etc & I would suggest that others do the same so as to reduce "OT" off topic postings on the LF group forum. 73 Gary - G4WGT. On 16 June 2011 12:18, Chris wrote: > I don't think so, we're rather being force fed. > Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the > various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not > intended for general reception. > Mal and others have noticed a big drop off in 137/500kHz activity - this > seems to me to have coincided with all this VLF stuff. Maybe we should > rename the Reflector 'VLF' not 'LF' as it currently is! > Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 AM > Subject: LF: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS > > > ZEVS I think is of interest to sufficient members of the group at the >> moment.:-) >> >> A slightly improved set up, this morning was the first time that my ZEVS >> Plot has given a lock over the full transmission. >> >> All DATA traces search a set window until they 'lock' onto the signal. >> I have highlighted the locked periods. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> >> > > --0016368e2a87dcf6f504a5d2bfd3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, Eddie & All,

I have also given this/these = subjects some thought & I have been seriously tempted to make a similar= statement as Chris has just posted.

As interestin= g they may be for the followers, this forum "LF" is not the place= for these discussions.

There are dedicated forums for these topics with dedica= ted followers & that is where the postings should be made.
I subscribe to several other forums in the fields of VLF &= sub 9kHz etc & I would suggest that others do the same so as to reduce= "OT" off topic postings on the LF group forum.

73

Gary - G4WGT.


On 16 June 2011 1= 2:18, Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com> wrote:
I don't think so, we're rather bein= g force fed.
Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the = various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not inte= nded for general reception.
Mal and others have noticed a big drop off in 137/500kHz activity - this se= ems to me to have coincided with all this VLF stuff. Maybe we should rename= the Reflector 'VLF' not 'LF' as it currently is!
Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.
----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" <qrss@talktalk.net>
To: <r= sgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 AM
Subject: LF: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS


ZEVS I think is of interest to sufficient members of the group at the
moment.:-)

A slightly improved set up, this morning was the first time that my ZEVS Plot has given a lock over the full transmission.

=A0All DATA traces search a set window until they 'lock' onto the s= ignal.
I have highlighted the locked periods.

73 Eddie G3ZJO




--0016368e2a87dcf6f504a5d2bfd3--