Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2BD2D380000A2; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:02:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QXBFH-0004Fr-RX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:00:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QXBFH-0004Fi-Ep for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:00:23 +0100 Received: from out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.245]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QXBFF-0004yx-2q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:00:23 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmsAANPv+U1OlmAu/2dsb2JhbAAMOgyXWEHZF4MdgwoEllKKfg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,375,1304290800"; d="scan'208";a="481167733" Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.2]) ([78.150.96.46]) by out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2011 13:00:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4DF9F04E.5070200@talktalk.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:00:14 +0100 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4DF9E12E.3020405@talktalk.net> <1DEEAA49EBA04DFC84153152C06B7B6A@IBM7FFA209F07C> In-Reply-To: <1DEEAA49EBA04DFC84153152C06B7B6A@IBM7FFA209F07C> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:456567008:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cb4df9f0b949ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Chris I was only joking, heaven knows we don't want to start debating it, or feed the Mal. Anyway an interesting view point all parts of which are easily countered. Force fed - there are groups for VLF,ELF ULF, I delete hundreds of posting hourly which are of no interest to me it cause me me no pain. Legal - this applies to all Wide views of VLF. Drop off - Yes empty bands make you look elsewhere, erm VLF even. Currently signals on LF 3 or 4, members keen on ZEVS and doing real experimentation 8 or 9. Motto always blame someone else:-) 73 Eddie. On 16/06/2011 12:18, Chris wrote: > I don't think so, we're rather being force fed. > Not even sure it's legal to receive this signal under the terms of the > various Wireless Telegraphy Acts, as it carries information and is not > intended for general reception. > Mal and others have noticed a big drop off in 137/500kHz activity - > this seems to me to have coincided with all this VLF stuff. Maybe we > should rename the Reflector 'VLF' not 'LF' as it currently is! > Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "qrss" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:55 AM > Subject: LF: OT Waffle or Spam ? A different look at ZEVS > > >> ZEVS I think is of interest to sufficient members of the group at the >> moment.:-) >> >> A slightly improved set up, this morning was the first time that my ZEVS >> Plot has given a lock over the full transmission. >> >> All DATA traces search a set window until they 'lock' onto the signal. >> I have highlighted the locked periods. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > > >