Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dj05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dj05.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.19.187.141]) by air-md04.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMD044-8b834df11ada12; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:11:22 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dj05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F1B7D38000152; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:11:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QUkbm-0004Y8-61 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:09:34 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QUkbk-0004Xz-Rw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:09:32 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QUkbj-000589-1m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:09:32 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p59J9T53013747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:09:29 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p59J9Tdu029903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:09:29 +0200 Received: from [129.206.205.139] (vpn205-139.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.205.139]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p59J9NEd021244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:09:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4DF11A74.9080609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:09:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: LF: LF propagation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039cdbc9d0a4df11ace18cc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) LF, Today the local noise is very low, at least here in DL. But the LF propagation seems to be poor, no trace at all on the YO/4X1RF LF grabber. Maybe the bad propagation is another reason for the low QRN? Normally the band is open to that time. In the range below 1000 km it seems to be OK, almost as usual. Good copy of G3KEV (now)and F8BOJ (in the afternoon). 73, Stefan