Message-ID: <4DE7D15F.7030302@talktalk.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:07:27 +0100
From: qrss <qrss@talktalk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4DE7AF61.3080402@talktalk.net> <4DE658F80012A54E@smtp209.alice.it> (added by postmaster@alice.it)
In-Reply-To: <4DE658F80012A54E@smtp209.alice.it> (added by postmaster@alice.it)
Subject: Re: LF: Schumann - publish and be damned
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Thanks Marco

It is good to get your opinion, there are several carriers around being 
an urban environment.

Some things that provoked my posting the Grab for comments. Victor 
confirms the same frequencies, the resonances are only visible on 
certain days which makes them appear to be propagated and the 
coincidence of being on approximately the published frequencies.

We need more examples from good quiet locations for comparison, the Grab 
was from 15th May, I take a Grab occasionally, I will look at some of 
the others and compare to see if the frequency varies.

73 Eddie G3ZJO



On 02/06/2011 18:10, Marco IK1ODO wrote:
> At 17:42 02/06/2011, you wrote:
>> LF
>>
>> Yes it is not Amateur Radio but there is none of that at the moment.
>>
>> It seems after many weeks that these are indeed Schumann resonances, 
>> if not I hereby declare the Victor/Eddie Resonances.
>
> :-)
>
> er... well... possibly not ... it seems to me like local noise, 
> possibly IMD products.
>
> Marco IK1ODO
>
>
>