Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.130]) by air-mb06.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMB063-a7664de77b6d16e; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:00:45 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C6AC738000099; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:00:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QS6Z4-0004zx-1I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:59:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QS6Z3-0004zo-Hc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:59:49 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QS6Z1-0001HS-RR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:59:49 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8CADx6500CZMTq/2dsb2JhbAAMR5gZ2ACGIQSVSYpP X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,309,1304290800"; d="scan'208";a="343510416" Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.4]) ([2.100.196.234]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2011 12:59:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4DE77B2B.4080601@talktalk.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:59:39 +0100 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Schumann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40824de77b6b7a78 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Victor Agreed. It is said that the SR is higher, I searched for data and examples. IK1QFK is off air still, exact frequencies are difficult to see from his capture, I can see that SR2 shows stronger though, I also agree with that. I have monitored and captured some better examples,but would like to be certain, I will send you one direct. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 02/06/2011 12:35, victor13@online.nl wrote: > Hi Eddie, > > two possibilities,the data are not correct,or we are seeing something > else... > > 73 > > Victor > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens qrss > Verzonden: donderdag 2 juni 2011 13:25 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: Schumann > > > Hi Victor > > Your findings agree with mine, the Schumann fundamental resonance is > high and does not agree with published data. My reason for not > displaying the Spectogram, just my tracking Plot of SR1,2,3,4,5. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO. > > On 02/06/2011 11:44, victor13@online.nl wrote: >> HI lf, >> >> not amateurradio but very interesting,zevs and the Schumannresonances.No >> sign of the 60Hz powergrid,yet.. >> >> 73 >> >> Victor > > >