Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.10]) by air-de01.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDE014-5ea54dbdbc8e368; Sun, 01 May 2011 16:03:26 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E494338000084; Sun, 1 May 2011 16:03:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QGcqo-0004pL-0t for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 21:02:42 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QGcqn-0004pC-IA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 21:02:41 +0100 Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QGcql-00066w-5f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 21:02:41 +0100 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so5443768wwk.28 for ; Sun, 01 May 2011 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=Qrp97LLWHjm2hpREBQAfRAQc1+P+gbZa9kAeyxqbg5s=; b=vrP8hwLSVeYYSXArhEBtNCkn3i1clsS3BZbk/JncVUTR4cJ4tDhZq5cbWao/88xpe0 NAOTm1xHCPtbrSUtJUF652tDJd0lzFhm2qtFX43ePw/W9TulCQiTZOe08ECUKXV+au21 D8cjccqfGL3EIE3ZUaOhPsEDBBZPtKedpxk2o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=UKmgZZlmhiNleyxr/h/dyo1ltsmboGvoo5aOmTuuFy0uhaoLwc5KslO/EyiRqzEnZV DIEM/mQJeySW5scSZPrXG4dbRNNLhkabnEGm9vWAmDYeY5FyU59AWVGIcsOPfvpNOHh8 FIwN/zWCe2mJ+XKGvunjQZxJOn2SDV8HBg558= Received: by 10.227.165.10 with SMTP id g10mr1833887wby.91.1304280153394; Sun, 01 May 2011 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpc3-cmbg14-0-0-cust445.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [213.106.93.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o23sm2976624wbc.10.2011.05.01.13.02.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 01 May 2011 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT) References: <4DBD9AB1.1000201@telus.net> <86212C3D-A6C9-486D-99BF-AD52649BA8D0@gmail.com> <4DBDB8F8.8060304@telus.net> From: Roger Lapthorn X-Mailer: iPod Mail (8F190) In-Reply-To: <4DBDB8F8.8060304@telus.net> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 21:03:06 +0100 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPod Mail 8F190) DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: Continued VE7TIL LF grabber outage... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d004.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410a4dbdbc8c459d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Scott I'm wondering how far up/down the coast a signal can be detected with a si= milar electrode probe pair (one in the water and one on land)? Alternative= ly looking for the signal along the shoreline with a horizontal loop or E-= field probe? Could be an interesting test.=20 73s Roger G3XBM Via my 2.4GHz handheld (iPod Touch 4g) On 1 May 2011, at 20:48, Scott Tilley wrote: > Hi Roger >=20 > The closest electrode to the ocean is feeding into a creek that itself= feeds into the ocean. This electrode is <75m from the salt water. The= other electrode is about 0.5km inland at my house. >=20 > Within about 2-3km of the setup I can run PSK250 with good SNR and near= perfect copy with on about 30W feed into the antenna. Once outside this= range things degrade rapidly... >=20 > Placing an electrode into the salt water won't last too long with the be= achcombers, dogs and electrofobes passing by etc. >=20 > 73 Scott >=20 >=20 > On 5/1/2011 10:47 AM, Roger Lapthorn wrote: >> Scott >>=20 >> How close to the ocean are the electrodes in the earth mode tests? Can= you try with one in the ocean and one some way inland? >>=20 >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >>=20 >> Via my 2.4GHz handheld (iPod Touch 4g) >>=20 >> On 1 May 2011, at 18:38, Scott Tilley wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi All >>>=20 >>> The VE7TIL 2200m grabber will remain off for another week or so. This= is do to a hardware failure in a wide band amplifier in the the DDS syste= m. I'm waiting for some replacement parts as my efforts to make repairs= with parts on hand were less than satisfactory. >>>=20 >>> I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused users. >>>=20 >>> However, by the grabber returns to operation it will be augmented by= a new VLF grabber page. I just finished installing the loop in the garde= n and it is working wonderfully. I spent the evening last night listening= to tweeks/atmospherics and comparing my results on the VLF transmissions= with that of Laurence KL7UK in AK... >>>=20 >>> Work on preparing a 8970 test transmission into my LF loop continues= and I expect to have the time to perform QRP tests later in May. Earth= mode testing continues and so far best DX has been about 10km. Interes= tingly, the best path seems to be along the shore of ocean here. Inland= propagation over the poor rocky ground here does not penetrate very far. >>>=20 >>> 73 Scott >>> VE7TIL >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20