Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.141]) by air-da01.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDA013-86394dda4fc62d6; Mon, 23 May 2011 08:15:02 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F0FFE380000AF; Mon, 23 May 2011 08:14:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QOU0q-0005xp-KF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 13:13:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QOU0q-0005xg-5q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 13:13:32 +0100 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QOU0n-0003DC-OE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 13:13:32 +0100 Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so7128466iyi.16 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:13:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3Ax77Br40LXaqmZnFZFQ5A4Y/qEROr0/t+crx6sW9HU=; b=ClYVfXUT5o+DJqGYgatu+7vsOA6ZNwCKJeOnKZfkihzPu5X3TiwQigFrVCivVfqA44 UEA8rQnkzzlDEwhQuMAEMD7bD8Mv/SIEpv2TDhwsc06dXug2yxFMNGQ0eF7h2n11VLzT LiRdndOcSq+R1VMGcptxZjsxbdYMlsfq8aBco= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fByCRvUEEypGwB2MjR0kcfz5/Rha9clBb1kguZ7vaXjtgp9TOtNBJm6Y5Gg+hh0O6r 9O6WQsrIRJZjGWQCfTtEhXHLBMKTAtKnXEfPASPEl41irTkSoBVHdYdx7ZBDYLgwm+Uj mZve4DGHlFTjlLgh2/4aPptwuFOJ2755J/lYo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.197 with SMTP id c5mr1115105ibl.131.1306152803088; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.208.15 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:13:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7F70CDE2-FFAF-4E06-8840-133B53D04F9B@numeo.fr> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:13:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: New RX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf13ded9b98c04a3f06555 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m273.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608d4dda4fba0bdf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --000e0cdf13ded9b98c04a3f06555 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There is, but it involves making up some extra hardware to generate a clock at 66.66666MHz. G4HUP does a module. http://g4hup.com/SDRlock.html using direct frequency synthesis (multiply / divide) or you could use a PLL. Andy www,g4jnt.com On 23 May 2011 11:07, James Moritz wrote: > Dear John, LF Group, > > I The main technical criticism I have of the SDR-IQ is that there is no > easy way of using an external frequency standard - but the internal standard > is no worse than the usual amateur rig/sound card combination, and is > adequate for most things. At this QTH, it is neccessary to connect an > appropriate filter between the antenna and SDR-IQ to attenuate the 10s of > volts per metre from local broadcasters, but this is also true of nearly all > other receivers, which usually don't have preselectors in the LF/MF range. > > Compared to other RXs, the SDR-IQ is fairly cheap - so maybe you can > persuade your birthday present buyers to throw in the laptop as well ;-) > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > --000e0cdf13ded9b98c04a3f06555 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There is, but it involves making up some extra hardware to generate= a clock at 66.66666MHz.=A0=A0 G4HUP does a module.=A0=A0=A0 http://g4hup.com/SDRlock.html=A0=A0 using= direct frequency synthesis (multiply / divide) or you could use a PLL.
=A0
Andy
=A0


=A0
On 23 May 2011 11:07, James Moritz <james.moritz@bto= penworld.com> wrote:
Dear John, LF Group,

I= The main technical criticism I have of the SDR-IQ is that there is no eas= y way of using an external frequency standard - but the internal standard= is no worse than the usual amateur rig/sound card combination, and is ade= quate for most things. At this QTH, it is neccessary to connect an appropr= iate filter between the antenna and SDR-IQ to attenuate the 10s of volts= per metre from local broadcasters, but this is also true of nearly all ot= her receivers, which usually don't have preselectors in the LF/MF rang= e.

Compared to other RXs, the SDR-IQ is fairly cheap - so maybe you can= persuade your birthday present buyers to throw in the laptop as well ;-)<= br>
Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU


--000e0cdf13ded9b98c04a3f06555--