Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.218]) by air-db07.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDB071-85f34dbed7481a4; Mon, 02 May 2011 12:09:44 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 536B4380002A6; Mon, 2 May 2011 12:09:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QGvfy-0000im-6G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:08:46 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QGvfx-0000id-KR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:08:45 +0100 Received: from nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QGvfx-0000G2-Ih for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:08:45 +0100 Received: from [217.146.183.210] by nm8.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 16:08:40 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.179] by tm3.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 16:08:40 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 16:08:40 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 128165.31396.bm@omp1020.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 36729 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2011 16:08:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1304352520; bh=XMRntfUS/Q81VacBmhKnsUV8jA+QTD6DJX5g5n+xiEE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UkNlmr2pEgJi8OaramDPkWD3FkvPPf7Aeh6Jlk1s51K+It8uYnRJO+mTLOjjKhA8w3eybWVq/A352qOkhZgN7Mh9Ci1zorxNyMDH5RAYRC56rwfM0eZ7/4o7b84BBhukqOqbDWbbMd975hkzlN3xfSfvbM+cckr4V540KYjPrrA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mg6JQjc/quaD1yd4BLVcisvqOiJBmfhXwAGSMBm9I+kBwZWg/oXlV24C09CcOUQ6HIox+KhVwTuAvjSPAGvx7W3EjwpWdjphgy0fQFe9QXt3uieNvTaEgFps+i0ojcw3JBYts9X1pigHkpW6pmGzCC0DEOxqpqG0tSvQIBFAvzU=; Message-ID: <819.35771.qm@web28108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 5AxXtwMVM1l3SekJlrueE1UKnH2j_N8y.XpISXg3clULsbp _a28SM7nG4ZMxe9PKy2MksmUde1mbPcASf8VJqGMbe7wCRMOXBZqNqmP9D8J MUNCwv1zsqFi0ctX6_ACQ8fz9SFjhFD0aJzGoS_toIufSN0QpenEtOWr_Pal WDsIdHeO54vt0YVVw.rRXTiZ1nHoIIaU9DAY1JzUbDtFdUUgI6gbKHxweK4u rdvWQBYMlt2YvuXvblR6tqPEFmjt8p53Oxp_LSbtlRmMbqbU14MZkue2nytC Qc1bGZfYGvdLKivlT75I_xjG7GVyTanwABfdTWGROo1BvIgyNePXKVF9CcWr K6rbcoNu4yLoIrB203GYK Received: from [86.134.236.136] by web28108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:08:39 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 References: <002101cc08b2$e3cc7510$ab655f30$@h.wright@btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:08:39 +0100 (BST) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <002101cc08b2$e3cc7510$ab655f30$@h.wright@btinternet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: Winrad calibration Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1587220691-1304352519=:35771" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d011.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60da4dbed74515d9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-1587220691-1304352519=:35771 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ken and LF >From my experience Winrad is not suitable for VLF reception.=A0The fact th= at=20 Dennis M0JXM can receive Chris (G3XIZ)=A0on Winrad is that their aerials= nearly=20 touch (an exaggeration) but its about 1.5km separation. Dennis can read Ch= ris=20 real time. I have looked at the 9kc/s spectrum using Winrad but I could no= t get=20 the band spread or the level of FFT iterations to resolve a signal as weak= as=20 Chris'. (I am sure some one tell me I am wrong). However all is not lost,= Spec=20 Lab is a free down load and runs on most=A0Win OS. With Spec lab you can= get down=20 to=A0mHz BW and have a 1 or 2Hz total display where the doubt and uncertai= nty are=20 removed as to what signal you are getting. Not only=A0that the frequency= =20 calibration can be automatically locked to one of the Mil stns=A0further= up the=20 band. I have spent ages trying to get a good signal from the low power VLF signa= ls and=20 I don't think it is easy, as Eddie and Stefan and Marcus will tell you bec= ause I=20 have bothered them about it. Where I live there are signals many many times stronger than Chris barely= 1/2Hz=20 away. When observe at the resolution required they appear very unstable wh= ereas=20 Chris' signal does not. It becomes obvious what you are looking at. By the= =20 stability standards required those very strong traces you are looking at= are=20 very unstable. They emanating from only a few yards away unless they can= be=20 identified as say a Mil stn or Line time base they are likely to be SMPSU= or the=20 like.. The beauty of Spec Lab is that you can use some one elses settings to get= pretty=20 well there. Stefan and Eddie have done a lot on this, they have hepled me= no=20 end. =A0So if you haven't started with Spec lab I=A0think it would be wort= h your=20 while and drop Winrad for this application. IMHO Winrad is a great SDR=20 application and I recommend it to any one who is starting using SDR but I= really=20 don't think it can cut the mustard on VLF. It's Horse for Courses Ken. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=20 ________________________________ From: Ken To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Mon, 2 May, 2011 11:22:49 Subject: LF: Winrad calibration VLF. How can I calibrate Winrad 1.6? I am seeing a trace at 8.99kHz, not sure= if it=20 is Chris with Winrad requiring calibration or something else. Still seeing= the=20 trace at 9.96 kHz, it is coming down the antenna I can see it on the doubl= et=20 with the E-probe psu switched off so must be a high level being just a sin= gle=20 trace unlikely to be an SMPU? =A0 73. Ken =A0 M0KHW=20 --0-1587220691-1304352519=:35771 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ken and LF
 
From my experience Winrad is not suitable for VLF reception. The= fact that Dennis M0JXM can receive Chris (G3XIZ) on Winrad is that= their aerials nearly touch (an exaggeration) but its about 1.5km separati= on. Dennis can read Chris real time. I have looked at the 9kc/s spectrum= using Winrad but I could not get the band spread or the level of FFT iter= ations to resolve a signal as weak as Chris'. (I am sure some one tell me= I am wrong). However all is not lost, Spec Lab is a free down load and ru= ns on most Win OS. With Spec lab you can get down to mHz BW and= have a 1 or 2Hz total display where the doubt and uncertainty are removed= as to what signal you are getting. Not only that the frequency calib= ration can be automatically locked to one of the Mil stns further up= the band.
I have spent ages trying to get a good signal from the low power VLF= signals and I don't think it is easy, as Eddie and Stefan and Marcus will= tell you because I have bothered them about it.
 
Where I live there are signals many many times stronger than Chris ba= rely 1/2Hz away. When observe at the resolution required they appear very= unstable whereas Chris' signal does not. It becomes obvious what you are= looking at. By the stability standards required those very strong traces= you are looking at are very unstable. They emanating from only a few yard= s away unless they can be identified as say a Mil stn or Line time base th= ey are likely to be SMPSU or the like..
 
The beauty of Spec Lab is that you can use some one elses settings to= get pretty well there. Stefan and Eddie have done a lot on this, they hav= e hepled me no end.  So if you haven't started with Spec lab I t= hink it would be worth your while and drop Winrad for this application. IM= HO Winrad is a great SDR application and I recommend it to any one who is= starting using SDR but I really don't think it can cut the mustard on VLF= . It's Horse for Courses Ken.
 
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX

=

From: Ken <ken.h.wright= @btinternet.com>
To:= rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent= : Mon, 2 May, 2011 11:22:49
Subject: LF: Winrad calibration