Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.140]) by air-mb01.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMB013-a1874de2d39684; Sun, 29 May 2011 19:15:34 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EBF753800008F; Sun, 29 May 2011 19:15:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QQpBp-00006b-9B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:14:33 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QQpBo-00006S-QO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:14:32 +0100 Received: from sidious.london.02.net ([82.132.130.152] helo=mail.o2.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QQpBm-0006as-Cl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:14:32 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.69] (87.194.98.211) by mail.o2.co.uk (8.5.119.05) (authenticated as m0dts@o2.co.uk) id 4D035EC3234DE84A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:23:43 +0100 Message-ID: <4DE2D34B.8060900@m0dts.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:14:19 +0100 From: "Rob, M0DTS" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <417699.31896.qm@web28511.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <001d01cc1e4f$0fe7a230$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <001d01cc1e4f$0fe7a230$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY=0.126,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF - G4WGT calling CQ 137.665 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080706060501070501050508" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4de2d3947515 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------080706060501070501050508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit I've heard quite a few signals on LF over the last week or two that are audible but I'll be a good 10dB lower with them so long cw it is for now... One day i will crop up on hand keyed cw but I'd have to learn it properly first.. one of things on the to do list but a signal is better than no signal! At present anyone who might hear my measly 20mW ERP on 136 will find my hand sent cw a tad difficult ;-) Mal - if i ever hear you i will endeavor to call you as you should be pretty strong but the result maybe not decipherable from my end and very weak..hi Chris - you are a fairly strong signal, can hear you come and go from the speaker no problem. I'm still working my TX here but will be active soon. Rob M0DTS IO94IL On 29/05/2011 23:23, mal hamilton wrote: > Chris > There are a few about on LF unfortunately using QRS when they are > strong enough to work CW. If they were using CW I would work them but > I do not want long drawn out QSO'S with local stations on QRS. > All those active at present on LF around EU are strong signals with me. > In the past CW was the norm and QRS was Lazy Mans CW, now it is the > reverse!! > de mal/g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Chris Osborn > *To:* LF Group > *Sent:* Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:14 PM > *Subject:* LF: LF - G4WGT calling CQ 137.665 kHz > > LF, > > Gary G4WGT is calling CQ using DFCW-3 > He is 'O' copy in IO92UB > > Is there anyone left on LF to answer him? > > 73 > Chris G3XIZ > --------------080706060501070501050508 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable I've heard quite a few signals on LF over the last week or two that are audible but I'll be a good 10dB lower with them so long cw it is for now...

One day i will crop up on hand keyed cw but I'd have to learn it properly first.. one of things on the to do list but a signal is better than no signal!

At present anyone who might hear my measly 20mW ERP on 136 will find my hand sent cw a tad difficult ;-)

Mal - if i ever hear you i will endeavor to call you as you should be pretty strong but the result maybe not decipherable from my end and very weak..hi
Chris - you are a fairly strong signal, can hear you come and go from the speaker no problem.

I'm still working my TX here but will be active soon.

Rob
M0DTS
IO94IL

On 29/05/2011 23:23, mal hamilton wrote:
Chris
There are a few=C2=A0about on LF unfortuna= tely using QRS when they are strong enough to work CW. If they were using CW I would work them but I do not want long drawn out QSO'S with local stations on QRS.
All those active at present on LF around EU are strong signals with me.
In the past CW was the norm and QRS was=C2=A0Lazy Mans=C2=A0CW,=C2=A0 now it is the reverse!!=
de mal/g3kev
=C2=A0
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 9:14 PM
Subject: LF: LF - G4WGT calling CQ 137.665 kHz

LF,

Gary G4WGT is calling CQ using DFCW-3
He is 'O' copy in IO92UB

Is there anyone left on LF to answer him?

73
Chris G3XIZ

--------------080706060501070501050508--