Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dg04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.12]) by air-db09.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDB091-85f54ddd05df19; Wed, 25 May 2011 09:36:31 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 59A353800008C; Wed, 25 May 2011 09:36:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QPEEb-00087C-8s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 14:34:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QPEEa-000873-T0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 14:34:48 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QPEEZ-0006SK-DB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 14:34:48 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p4PDYkaD000416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 15:34:46 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p4PDYk7f023911 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 15:34:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4DDD0507.2020802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:32:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000a01cc1aa9$707cbd00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4DDCBF54.2030202@dsl.pipex.com> <4DDCC515.4000901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4DDCE891.9070907@talktalk.net> In-Reply-To: <4DDCE891.9070907@talktalk.net> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id p4PDYkaD000416 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Alphas back? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410c4ddd05d97d14 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) GBZ (19.58 kHz) seems to come back too! Currently transmitting a=20 straight "carrier" that is at 35 dB SNR here, during strong QRN... Would be interesting to see that on your grabber Eddie ;-) 73, Stefan Am 25.05.2011 13:31, schrieb qrss: > Yes maybe they will be back. > Other than my theory of denial of use to the NATO alliance during=20 > hostilities that not all of the UN nations agree to, there is the=20 > possibility of a fault which is causing problems. > > G3PLX said there was a problem, a kink in phase, on one of the=20 > transmitters which was not cured after the last outage, which was,=20 > coincidentally? at the start of hostilities. > > No use to debate my theory, we will never know the truth. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO > > On 25/05/2011 10:00, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> Yes! There was a short pesence of them just before 7 UTC but now they= =20 >> are gone again. At least it seems they will come back at all. They=20 >> have been OFF for more than 2 weeks! >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> Am 25.05.2011 10:35, schrieb Chris Dillon: >>> Looks like the Alphas are preparing to start up again. >>> >>> 73 Chris G3WCD >> >> >