Message-ID: <4DD7BBDA.4030803@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 15:19:22 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <935661.1584.qm@web28501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <935661.1584.qm@web28501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Subject: LF: G3ZJO G3XIZ OK2BVG
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------080300030303000108040005"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--------------080300030303000108040005
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Chris, Eddie, Lubos, LF,

Eddie, i just tried to leave a trace on your grabber, but no chance. 
Either propagation or QRN? Will try again at night. VLF and LF grabber 
density is increasing and increasing :-) I hope the activity will rise 
in the same way soon.

I saw OK2BVG in DFCW-3 on the OE3GHB grabber and on the DF6NM grabber. 
Visible but not readable here in Heidelberg. Looking forward to further 
tests from Lubos. Maybe there is better copy in UK despite the higher 
distance? Lubos, what was the TX power? Have you used the VLF TX antenna?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 21.05.2011 13:35, schrieb Chris Osborn:
> A most useful LF grabber window Eddie.
>
> My DFCW frequencies are:
>
> 137.700 5 and 137.698 6 kHz
>
> Does anyone want to try for a CW / DFCW / QRSS QSO tomorrow morning ?
> I'll be calling CQ at around 08.00 Z
>
> 73
> Chris G3XIZ
>
> --- On *Sat, 21/5/11, qrss /<qrss@talktalk.net>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: qrss <qrss@talktalk.net>
>     Subject: LF: 136kHz Grabber G3ZJO
>     To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>     Date: Saturday, 21 May, 2011, 12:27
>
>     The top window of my VLF Grabber
>     http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm is showing a QRSS 3 view of
>     136kHz today.
>
>     Station 'A' is visible now on 137.690kHz which may be an
>     inaccurate readout here QRG?.
>
>     73 Eddie G3ZJO
>

--------------080300030303000108040005
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"   http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hello Chris, Eddie, Lubos, LF,<br>
<br>
Eddie, i just tried to leave a trace on your grabber, but no chance.
Either propagation or QRN? Will try again at night. VLF and LF grabber
density is increasing and increasing :-) I hope the activity will rise
in the same way soon. <br>
<br>
I saw OK2BVG in DFCW-3 on the OE3GHB grabber and on the DF6NM grabber.
Visible but not readable here in Heidelberg. Looking forward to further
tests from Lubos. Maybe there is better copy in UK despite the higher
distance? Lubos, what was the TX power? Have you used the VLF TX
antenna?<br>
<br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
<br>
Am 21.05.2011 13:35, schrieb Chris Osborn:
<blockquote cite="mid:935661.1584.qm@web28501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com"   type="cite">
  <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td   style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; -x-system-font: none;"   valign="top">A most useful LF grabber window Eddie.<br>
        <br>
My DFCW frequencies are:<br>
        <br>
137.700 5 and 137.698 6 kHz<br>
        <br>
Does anyone want to try for a CW / DFCW / QRSS QSO tomorrow morning ?<br>
I'll be calling CQ at around 08.00 Z<br>
        <br>
73<br>
Chris G3XIZ<br>
        <br>
--- On <b>Sat, 21/5/11, qrss <i><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:qrss@talktalk.net">&lt;qrss@talktalk.net&gt;</a></i></b>
wrote:<br>
        <blockquote   style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>
From: qrss <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:qrss@talktalk.net">&lt;qrss@talktalk.net&gt;</a><br>
Subject: LF: 136kHz Grabber G3ZJO<br>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org</a><br>
Date: Saturday, 21 May, 2011, 12:27<br>
          <br>
          <div class="plainMail">The top window of my VLF Grabber&nbsp; <a   moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm"   target="_blank">http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/index.htm</a> is showing a
QRSS 3 view of 136kHz today.<br>
          <br>
Station 'A' is visible now on 137.690kHz which may be an inaccurate
readout here QRG?.<br>
          <br>
73 Eddie G3ZJO<br>
          <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        </td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------080300030303000108040005--