Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.89]) by air-de07.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDE073-5ebc4dc5ab7212c; Sat, 07 May 2011 16:28:34 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B358D380000B8; Sat, 7 May 2011 16:28:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QIo5J-0007Hg-MX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:26:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QIo5I-0007HX-5W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:26:40 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QIo5H-0006Cr-NP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 21:26:40 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p47KQaLe019123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 22:26:36 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p47KQavV031624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 22:26:36 +0200 Received: from [129.206.205.200] (vpn205-200.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.205.200]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p47KQYtE018441 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 22:26:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4DC5AB0F.4090507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 22:26:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4DC572F2.9050003@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <4DC572F2.9050003@telus.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Spectrum Lab Filtering... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40594dc5ab6f52f7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Scott, I think there is not such a function so far. There is just a range where you can limit the auto notch apply, like 0...500 Hz. Today i improved the readability of a CW signal. The side tone was at 800 Hz. The filter has a BW of 200 Hz and 50 Hz slope. This is the best setting for a solid signal. Then i choosed the auto notch function but limited the operation range from 0...780 Hz and moved the filter so that the CW signal is still passing. These steps make the readability better than choosing a 100 Hz wide CW filter without the notch function. So the best (for optimising CW) would be to have two (or in your case: several) limiting ranges, i my case: 0...780 Hz plus 820 Hz...2000 Hz. I asked Wolf if this is possible to implement but the easter WX was to good here, HI. And there are several other querys on his table too, i am sure :-) Wolf? :-) Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.05.2011 18:27, schrieb Scott Tilley: > Hi All > > Does anyone know how to select multiple frequency ranges for the > autonotch filter in SL? > > Specifically, I'd like to setup the autonotch filter to avoid the > various Alpha QRGs if this is possible. The only obvious parameters > only seem to allow one to select one range for the autonotch filter to > act on. > > Anyone have any thoughts? > > 73, > Scott > VE7TIL