Message-ID: <4DC29569.8040605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 14:17:45 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4DC28736.5070405@talktalk.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DC28736.5070405@talktalk.net>
Subject: Re: LF: ELF Zevs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hello Eddie,

This looks quiete promising to me! I know there are some OMs who have 
often received the ZEVS (F4DTL or F5WK?) and may comment on this.
But such a straight line on about the right frequency is a good 
indicator. Renato Romero once told me that ZEVS is QRV arround this 
time, and just in this time for 1...2 hours i remember.

Will try that too :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 05.05.2011 13:17, schrieb qrss:
> Stefan LF
>
> Today, early morning was so quiet on VLF that I thought that my ELF 
> SpecLab RX I was running yesterday was playing up, I started a second 
> RX with a faster sample rate, which is on my Grabber now.
>
> Once both were set up I took a look for ZEVS. See zevs1.jpg from the 
> first RX. Maybe the signal came up in strength at 09.30 for 1 Hour the 
> frequency was spot on 82Hz, the readout of the cross hairs can be 
> slightly above or below not correct.
> Checking the second RX see zevs2.jpg it looks more like it switched on 
> at 09.30 for 1 hour precisely, this time I settled the cross hairs at 
> the higher readout.
>
> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>
> Disclaimer. This is NOT Amateur Radio, a straight line on the exact 
> frequency is no proof that the carrier belongs to ZEVS ....blah blah 
> YAWN.>:o
>
>