Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.85]) by air-dd04.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINDD044-86ac4dc14fe23; Wed, 04 May 2011 09:08:50 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 56C78380000DF; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:08:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QHbnK-00078P-3a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:07:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QHbnI-00078G-Oi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:07:08 +0100 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QHbnG-0002tu-Kx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:07:08 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYCAGNOwU0CZM29/2dsb2JhbAAMmDzTUIYHBJNuigI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,314,1301871600"; d="scan'208";a="363503327" Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.4]) ([2.100.205.189]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 04 May 2011 14:06:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4DC14F71.9050600@talktalk.net> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 14:06:57 +0100 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4DC0E8DA.4070402@talktalk.net> <4DC13500.4070702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4DC13500.4070702@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: G3ZJO grabber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554dc14fdc60bc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello Stefan I was prompted to take a look 'down low' a couple of weeks ago when=20 SM5LE said, look 'Schumann resonances'. You will be surprised that I am=20 using your E-Probe, unmodified. I wasn't expecting to see much so I was=20 surprised by the results. Have I seen Schumann resonances? I am not going to say, proof needs time= =20 of observation. Information about the signals and phenomena down there is scarce, I have= =20 heard mention of 90Hz for submarine comms so many thanks for the link I=20 have removed my LPF and shifted the window up to take a look on 82Hz. EDIT Carrier at 80.2Hz, 75.2Hz and 64.24Hz which would seem to be a harmonic=20 of the 32Hz and likewise the 16Hz a sub harmonic of 32Hz. My searches for information have certainly taken me to Renato's page, I=20 was showing a link to his site as a 8.9kHz Grabber, since looking at his= =20 site I have moved him into a Link class of his own. There have been questions about the pulses of interference at ULF. When=20 we look at our VLF Wide displays the Sferics seem to peter out around=20 3kHz, (your filter is doing its job). However I have used the 0....50Hz=20 view to prove to my own satisfaction that Sferics are still going strong= =20 down to 0Hz. Probably removing the 3kHz cut of would cause havoc down ther= e. There are several carriers of unknown origin, maybe due to my urban=20 location which I can investigate. Any thoughts of what runs at 32Hz=20 would be welcome, I am pretty sure it comes down from the antenna. Well,= =20 when there are no tests on 8.9kHz I can keep interested. 73 Eddie On 04/05/2011 12:14, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > Hello Eddie, VLF, > > Your additional grabber windows are interesting. Remembers me to the=20 > site of Renato Romero ;-) > What antenna do you use for displaying the range of 0...50 Hz? My=20 > probe circuit has a high pass filter with an edge frequency of about 3= =20 > kHz. So if your QRM below 3 kHz is not to strong, you may remove that=20 > and get better signals on ELF. Have you ever received the ZEVS at 82=20 > Hz? http://www.vlf.it/zevs/zevs.htm > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >