Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.87]) by air-md02.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMD021-8b784dd925d3351; Sun, 22 May 2011 11:03:47 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 776AF38000088; Sun, 22 May 2011 11:03:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QOAB8-0003hk-RU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:02:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QOAB8-0003hb-Au for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:02:50 +0100 Received: from smtpout03.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.115] helo=email.aon.at) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QOAB5-000757-TV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:02:50 +0100 Received: (qmail 14540 invoked from network); 22 May 2011 15:02:41 -0000 Received: from 93-82-9-171.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([93.82.9.171]) (envelope-sender ) by smarthub93.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 May 2011 15:02:40 -0000 From: Gerhard Hickl To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4DD8F44E.4060801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <253986.40624.qm@web28510.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4DD8F44E.4060801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 17:02:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1306076561.1955.16.camel@gerhard-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: LF CW center of activity?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40574dd925d0084a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Stefan and group! >From my point of view, a QRG around 137.2kHz would be the best choice for a CW-QSO. This is just the cleanest QRG here in central to east Europe. Below, HGA22 is an issue and above DCF39 is splattering in. Just a proposal. 73 OE3GHB Gerhard Am Sonntag, den 22.05.2011, 13:32 +0200 schrieb Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer: > LF, >=20 > Is there actually a center of activity on LF in CW mode? >=20 > Usually i am on 136.8 kHz but if most stations listen and call on 136.5= =20 > i will QSY to that QRG too for my calls. I think a center of activity=20 > would be most useful to coordinate the CW activity. > Looking forward to the quieter season :-) There are strong thunderstorms= =20 > in the moment near Heidelberg, no chance here. The grabber is almost=20 > totally white ;-) >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20