Message-ID: <4DACB3F8.4090806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:58:16 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <874D6DB736EA43C580559ED30ABE7BE6@KKneu> <4DACA474.7060304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1303160968.4daca888b9d70@imp.netikka.net>
In-Reply-To: <1303160968.4daca888b9d70@imp.netikka.net>
Subject: Re: LF: AW: Re: CW NOW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hello Paul-Henrik,

Thanks for the effort. I would be glad to be copied in OH again=20
(remembering a QSO with OH5UFO in 2003). If there is no wind at the=20
weekend, i will be QRV again!

73, Stefan

Am 18.04.2011 23:09, schrieb Paul-Henrik:
> Hallo Stefan, LF
>
> For once the local QRM on 137kHz was off and I had a chance to listen in=
.
> Unfortunately I could not hear anything from you but I heard the two las=
t
> transmissions from Albert.
>
> IC-R75&  unresonated Inv. L trough a 25:1 XFRMR
>
> BR
>
> Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ
> Vaasa, KP03SD
>
> Quoting Stefan Sch=E4fer<Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>:
>
>   =20
>> Albert, Klaus, Clemens, Jim, Dave, Marco, LF,
>>
>> Many thanks for the reply and TNX to Albert for the QSO. It was my firs=
t
>> CW test here from the new LF station.
>> Well, it seems not to be the best time for a CW QSO but all in all i
>> hope i can gain some more dBs by optimising the RX antenna. Surely i
>> will add some dBs on my side soon. That may help a bit for the QSO
>> partners. Albert was the only station i could hear and it was very
>> difficult and with some QSB at the end.
>>
>> A quiet sunday morning may be a better time for tests so maybe we can
>> try this again? :-) Who of the stations would be able to _answer_ to a
>> call? I know of M0BMU, PA0A, DF6NM, G3YXM, G3KEV, OE5ODL and HB9ASB.
>> DB6NT makes a big signal here as well but not sure if he is QRV in CW..=
.
>>
>> Looking forward to future tests :-)
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>> Am 18.04.2011 22:24, schrieb KKorn:
>>     =20
>>> Stefan
>>> your "CQ LF" here abt 559 (-90 to-100dBm) on my SPM-3 / 25m LW app. 12=
m up.
>>>
>>>
>>> Gr=FC=DFe / Greetings
>>> Klaus
>>> DJ6LB
>>> ~~~ LIFE'S TOUGH ! ~~~
>>> ~~~ It's even tougher, if you are STUPID ! ~~~
>>> John Wayne
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       =20
>>     =20
>
>
>
>   =20