Message-ID: <4DACA474.7060304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:52:04 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <874D6DB736EA43C580559ED30ABE7BE6@KKneu>
In-Reply-To: <874D6DB736EA43C580559ED30ABE7BE6@KKneu>
Subject: Re: LF: AW: Re: CW NOW
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------010403080600030300050307"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--------------010403080600030300050307
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id p3IKrKc9003681

Albert, Klaus, Clemens, Jim, Dave, Marco, LF,

Many thanks for the reply and TNX to Albert for the QSO. It was my first=
=20
CW test here from the new LF station.
Well, it seems not to be the best time for a CW QSO but all in all i=20
hope i can gain some more dBs by optimising the RX antenna. Surely i=20
will add some dBs on my side soon. That may help a bit for the QSO=20
partners. Albert was the only station i could hear and it was very=20
difficult and with some QSB at the end.

A quiet sunday morning may be a better time for tests so maybe we can=20
try this again? :-) Who of the stations would be able to _answer_ to a=20
call? I know of M0BMU, PA0A, DF6NM, G3YXM, G3KEV, OE5ODL and HB9ASB.=20
DB6NT makes a big signal here as well but not sure if he is QRV in CW...

Looking forward to future tests :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 18.04.2011 22:24, schrieb KKorn:
> Stefan
> your "CQ LF" here abt 559 (-90 to-100dBm) on my SPM-3 / 25m LW app. 12m=
 up.
>
>
> Gr=FC=DFe / Greetings
> Klaus
> DJ6LB
> ~~~ LIFE'S TOUGH ! ~~~
> ~~~ It's even tougher, if you are STUPID ! ~~~
> John Wayne
>
>
>   =20

--------------010403080600030300050307
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"   http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Albert, Klaus, Clemens, Jim, Dave, Marco, LF, <br>
<br>
Many thanks for the reply and TNX to Albert for the QSO. It was my
first CW test here from the new LF station. <br>
Well, it seems not to be the best time for a CW QSO but all in all i
hope i can gain some more dBs by optimising the RX antenna. Surely i
will add some dBs on my side soon. That may help a bit for the QSO
partners. Albert was the only station i could hear and it was very
difficult and with some QSB at the end.<br>
<br>
A quiet sunday morning may be a better time for tests so maybe we can
try this again? :-) Who of the stations would be able to <u>answer</u>
to a call? I know of M0BMU, PA0A, DF6NM, G3YXM, G3KEV, OE5ODL and
HB9ASB. DB6NT makes a big signal here as well but not sure if he is QRV
in CW...<br>
<br>
Looking forward to future tests :-)<br>
<br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 18.04.2011 22:24, schrieb KKorn:
<blockquote cite="mid:874D6DB736EA43C580559ED30ABE7BE6@KKneu"   type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">Stefan
your "CQ LF" here abt 559 (-90 to-100dBm) on my SPM-3 / 25m LW app. 12m up.


Gr&uuml;&szlig;e / Greetings
Klaus
DJ6LB
~~~ LIFE'S TOUGH ! ~~~
~~~ It's even tougher, if you are STUPID ! ~~~
John Wayne


  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------010403080600030300050307--