Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.180.6]) by air-db09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB091-85f54d9d6ea71b8; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:58:31 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8F6EF380000F7; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 03:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q7k5K-0001dS-CT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 08:56:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q7k5I-0001dF-JM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 08:56:56 +0100 Received: from nm17.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.191]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7k5I-0002c1-FS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 08:56:56 +0100 Received: from [217.146.183.211] by nm17.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Apr 2011 07:56:50 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.40] by tm4.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Apr 2011 07:56:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1025.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Apr 2011 07:56:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 472085.4752.bm@omp1025.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 39279 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Apr 2011 07:56:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1302163010; bh=ll/992j7JyPwimqVaF0H4lQ/IBIT5J26DMUjD3QwZPQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dUPVhtbvYFIOkAJ6FlUT5z+aW5V+ZVu+iYSRLBJny5gP5mQsfV3Cn/hmlo+U0rLoNuQ2now2Z3cBnPeq+vT6Nq8EiF3gONeOglJXcm7hAgdBtc28NmzMk2n7Re+SZBh91L9K2FxzXV2DrHpEOqJBiiIxTw/l8nIFC6n6ZWAv5Bg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yaZE4Yk8ZX6qJZcRrmcfN6AY0NvBgCQKNIXlN3/4ODP7aOs5x5P28kmotdvOuLxaaqJrUrLJxZFfftUwZnBTNHYZSXICCmcg9DLb63tU6g1UMTpm7FoeO3ujZqdafJnbebTGZNLwXi+dLBj6AlF8soumljNTIULlDvwagZ5XOGk=; Message-ID: <280367.18791.qm@web28514.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: ryMWggcVM1mpcntv8eDwHgtoBve02yp5zKCzFYI7_9RQuMq 5IVzU1evOwAQvPtlawGk3tevTc3N9kJHW_Wb1ukZbgv4Ane54IDFgZjQnxYn iig36FJkpElwZdRqfDLJfrgVNm3emGyZ6v3D6FO59poADFGA1f3U7yCIZx20 RaB4Je2EJqe.edyj200YYICr21gpeFAmE6boWcrje5ev_NdaO_e1aoZHGZJa iRrbWrwfoMNobpdZ3xjVF4iOEjcA_BUuYYkQBJ2m7NjaqZqlbUmZrb_JtHEU 5Y4gaNtds..0sa24NHMlISBzIW4NmCS3DPuFAH4cHhDVC05SlZheK4Maq Received: from [194.62.210.50] by web28514.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 08:56:50 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:56:50 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Osborn To: LF Group Cc: Paul Nicholson In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: LF: Re: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1706144306-1302163010=:18791" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d244.2 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4064d9d6ea45001 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-1706144306-1302163010=:18791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger, LF, =A0 Very interesting. =A0 I did do some impromtu testing last night on my usual frequency of 8.976= 661 6 kHz I have installed a cover (tarpaulin) over my loading coil to keep out the= rain and=A0was checking to see=A0whether it would affect the Q. If anything results seem better=A0! =A0 I eventually shut down at 21.30 (20.30Z) so the over night signal is a mys= tery. Others have noticed a stable carrier on or near my 'usual' frequency in th= e past. =A0 I plan to transmit overnight tonight (7/8th April) on the above frequency= so would as usual welcome any reports. =A0 If anything my loading coil's inductance is slightly high for the working= frequency and I guess the tarpaulin cover has reduced it somewhat and thu= s improved the tuning. I have planned for some time to=A0make a variometer to facilitate fine tun= ing but have had trouble sourcing a suitable coil former (ideally a beer= brewing bin or such like). =A0 73 Chris G3XIZ =A0 =A0 --- On Thu, 7/4/11, Roger Lapthorn wrote: From: Roger Lapthorn Subject: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, sub9khz@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Osborn"= , "g3zjo" Date: Thursday, 7 April, 2011, 8:19 Overnight I was seeing a weak line at 8.976665kHz lasting from around 0200= to around 0700 (now) on SL with 424uHz setting. The grabber is still on,= so you can look yourselves. See https://dl.dropbox.com/u/15047843/xbm_gra= b.jpg . G3ZJO's grabber is not on to correlate with Eddie's location. My question is who or what is it? G3XIZ was active last evening, but I do= not know if Chris left his TX on overnight. The signal (or interferer) is= extremely stable and was detected using the earth electrode antenna (2 el= ectrodes in the garden 15m apart with an elevated wire connection (a loop= with the earth return if you like). 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ --0-1706144306-1302163010=:18791 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger, LF,
 
Very interesting.
 
I did do some impromtu testing last night on my usual frequency of 8.976 661 6 kHz
I have installed a cover (tarpaulin) over my loading coil to keep out= the rain and was checking to see whether it would affect the Q.=
If anything results seem better !
 
I eventually shut down at 21.30 (20.30Z) so the over night signal is= a mystery.
Others have noticed a stable carrier on or near my 'usual' frequency= in the past.
 
I plan to transmit overnight tonight (7/8th April)= on the above frequency so would as usual welcome any reports.
 
If anything my loading coil's inductance is slightly high for the wor= king frequency and I guess the tarpaulin cover has reduced it somewhat and= thus improved the tuning.
I have planned for some time to make a variometer to facilitate= fine tuning but have had trouble sourcing a suitable coil former (ideally= a beer brewing bin or such like).
 
73
Chris G3XIZ
 
 


--- On Thu, 7/4/11, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gm= ail.com> wrote:

From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.co= m>
Subject: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz
To: rsg= b_lf_group@blacksheep.org, sub9khz@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Osborn" <g3x= iz@yahoo.co.uk>, "g3zjo" <g3zjo@npton.plus.com>
Date: Thursday= , 7 April, 2011, 8:19

Overnight I was seeing a weak line at 8.976665kHz= lasting from around 0200 to around 0700 (now) on SL with 424uHz setting.= The grabber is still on, so you can look yourselves. See = https://dl.dropbox.com/u/15047843/xbm_grab.jpg . G3ZJO's grabber is no= t on to correlate with Eddie's location.

My question is who or what= is it? G3XIZ was active last evening, but I do not know if Chris left his= TX on overnight. The signal (or interferer) is extremely stable and was= detected using the earth electrode antenna (2 electrodes in the garden 15= m apart with an elevated wire connection (a loop with the earth return if= you like).

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3x= bm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube= .com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/=

--0-1706144306-1302163010=:18791--