Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.141]) by air-mc07.mail.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILINMC074-a97e4db923eb120; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:23:07 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D18003800008E; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QFMTv-0002N2-3c for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:21:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QFMTt-0002Mt-Lq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:21:49 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QFMTr-0001Ea-Jl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:21:49 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoCAG4iuU1cHYwj/2dsb2JhbACYED+NLnfCbYV2BIILkQGJWg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,279,1301871600"; d="scan'208,217";a="330967579" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.140.35]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2011 09:21:40 +0100 Message-ID: <001301cc057d$4a02a540$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <5084A620A0804D1CABDAF2587B82CE4C@White> <20D2647CF38F4C73A219F0D0F9B7A41E@PCvanAlbert> <4DB88D89.1070604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7BB6C050E347406C9C18641F96C4286A@PCvanAlbert> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:21:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01CC0585.AB845EF0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4db923e85b16 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CC0585.AB845EF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes if we all use CW, it is more effective and some expertise is requ= ired. WSPR is an Appliance Operator mode that does not always decode= whereas CW or QRS can easily be read directly by EAR or seen by the= EYE.=20 G3KEV =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Albert=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:21 PM Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz Thanks Stefan, Are you not active in WSPR ? It would be more effective if we all us= e the same modes. (at least on specific days) I like WSPR because you= can clearly and easily see the change of signal strenght over a longe= r time at a number of stations. Also QSO's are possible using WSJT7 in= the WSPR mode. Using CMSK is an other possibility to QSO at low signa= l levels. 73, Albert =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:41 PM Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz Hello Albert, Your WSPR signal in 976 mHz, received in my wideband window at htt= p://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html Noisy evening here, many lightnings... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 27.04.2011 18:52, schrieb Albert:=20 All, 2nite WSPR TX on 137.5 kHz (dial 136) tx fraction 30% 73, Albert PA0A ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CC0585.AB845EF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes if we all use CW,  it is more effecti= ve and some=20 expertise is required. WSPR is an Appliance Operator mode that does no= t always=20 decode whereas CW or QRS can easily be read  directly by EAR or= seen by the=20 EYE.
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Alb= ert
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 20= 11 11:21=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz=

Thanks Stefan,
 
Are you not active in WSPR ? It wou= ld=20 be more effective if we all use the same modes. (at least on sp= ecific=20 days) I like WSPR because you can clearly and easily see the change= of signal=20 strenght over a longer time at a number of=20 stations. Also QSO's are possible using WSJT7 in the= WSPR mode.=20 Using CMSK is an other possibility to QSO at low signal levels.
 
73, Albert
 
     
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 27,= 2011 11:41=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Acti 137= kHz

Hello Albert,

Your WSPR signal in 976 mHz,= received in=20 my wideband window at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabbe= r.html

Noisy=20 evening here, many lightnings...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am=20 27.04.2011 18:52, schrieb Albert:=20
All,
 
2nite WSPR TX on 137.5 kHz (dia= l 136) tx=20 fraction 30%
 
73, Albert=20 PA0A
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CC0585.AB845EF0--