Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.74]) by air-dc02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC023-864e4d7276966e; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:44:54 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8386C380000AB; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 12:44:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PvvWO-0005d6-5k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:44:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PvvWN-0005cx-Ms for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:44:03 +0000 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PvvWL-0005l8-6V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:44:03 +0000 Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so3822031iyf.16 for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 09:43:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lHyaQMkN43LT4CLnTgulnKPxo3ELZKbmTibHt9fDx4k=; b=Fmta2pYkLttMErhjmNgGUqkRCmCT+b+BxCR4vbebcjAaJjrPQTVOtdvX5EZwjpFp4U Kj+tRzsKFscC6zZhVj8FoQoL5Oqz0RmaB9znPRS7qSzvkpcu369rznaHQRO7vV8rfPnr kuKIuHey8CcA62Yy6gGZ8UaLzWazet7+fNu6c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RBFpb4y161qsC8skA05zfdEM/xIeAR4KNHY3IouFxX699PE8T+OpjE042yvC1nZIpe QGZ7Cfs1O+fVKrpFiF2JWYfz4LXqFzu8MQ9E4yS8QPV7w99wWhFI7kSxalsKYyWIEO6m lIDTohF3QBjMbExAiizbFFcXOqzyXT2tc3YH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.213.135 with SMTP id gw7mr2416966icb.126.1299347034222; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 09:43:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.229.137 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:43:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <351109.48766.qm@web28502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <351109.48766.qm@web28502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 17:43:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_10_20=0.945,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ QRT at 16.50 Z Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30549f636a30d1049dbfcedf X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m019.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604a4d7276945d7a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --20cf30549f636a30d1049dbfcedf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Chris (G3XIZ) It would be interesting to see a summary here of all the reports you've had with the inverted-L and 100W on 9.0909kHz today and earlier in the week. At best you were around 8dB S/N in 423uHz with me at 45km this morning. I stopped looking around 0900 as I wanted to check 8.970kHz although nothing was seen there. I think other semi-locals were getting you at reasonable levels too. How many stations have now managed to copy you, at what distance and at what strength? If you know it, what receiver systems were they using and what bandwidth settings on Spectrum Lab or whatever? Your best DX is still, I believe, 218km from Paul Nicholson in Todmorden. The higher frequency stability from the OCXO has certainly helped you get a few more reports from further afield. Thanks for giving us the challenge and fun of looking for your VLF signal. It beats shouting oneself dry in the ARRL DX contest any day. You have already proved that VLF TXing can be successful from a small back garden style antenna with only moderate power. I am left wondering how successful my 80m sq loop might be at launching a small *radiated* VLF signal. 73s Roger G3XBM -- g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ www.g3xbm.co.uk www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --20cf30549f636a30d1049dbfcedf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris (G3XIZ)

It would be interesting to see a summary here of= all the reports you've had with the inverted-L and 100W on 9.0909kHz= today and earlier in the week. At best you were around 8dB S/N in 423uHz= with me at 45km this morning. I stopped looking around 0900 as I wanted= to check 8.970kHz although nothing was seen there. I think other semi-loc= als were getting you at reasonable levels too.

How many stations have now managed to copy you, at what distance and= at what strength? If you know it, what receiver systems were they using= and what bandwidth settings on Spectrum Lab or whatever? Your best DX is= still, I believe, 218km from Paul Nicholson in Todmorden. The higher freq= uency stability from the OCXO has certainly helped you get a few more repo= rts from further afield.

Thanks for giving us the challenge and fun of looking for your VLF sig= nal. It beats shouting oneself dry in the ARRL DX contest any day. You hav= e already proved that VLF TXing can be successful from a small back garden= style antenna with only moderate power. I am left wondering how successfu= l my 80m sq loop might be at launching a small radiated VLF signal.=

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
g3= xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678= =A0=A0=A0 ISWL G11088
--20cf30549f636a30d1049dbfcedf--