Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dj02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dj02.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.19.187.138]) by air-mb01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB011-a0764d838fe62fa; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:01:26 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dj02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AE8BD38000091; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q0d2L-0003RH-QB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:00:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q0d2L-0003R8-8Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:00:29 +0000 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0d2I-0002aI-FL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:00:29 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1483715wwi.4 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:00:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=5N0o1qBWe90sHrBo5Qzv1GyOItmh8awqrmhJFIQqzqE=; b=iYnnvl3Vqpd3Dqsm9TenIQ5Z3dpf0954hNTOzhuW8maKLVb1pWtuy/Z6UJ2u130tBR UBcxdTiRv90Bm5gKf+EqFjRWosCfwscFWE7sNWpTpPO5EndnZazNLf1ab1FSIFmO05ly 8VfTrxaKCEZw7djjPN/Zzey2XcQUyy11d0U88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=EBG4xLCBXNrBH7PZRJxy/UzqAidJQRM+VDUgvszv7WbzQ1xK9mwkeHxfSiweqINY5w MJW4irjMQFZciikzT46bu5ARKYBtz6/ts15lUggxlFbSOFh9byk/65kcsyQnaB/n0O24 5kas8zZ5sBMdCmWSOP3dv4Oim0uCzmcffx0qo= Received: by 10.227.30.141 with SMTP id u13mr1490897wbc.144.1300467619907; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpc3-cmbg14-0-0-cust445.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [213.106.93.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h11sm1466598wbc.9.2011.03.18.10.00.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:00:18 -0700 (PDT) References: From: Roger Lapthorn X-Mailer: iPod Mail (8F190) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <91B080A0-C675-4E50-BC5E-F6241937FF6E@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:59:58 +0000 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPod Mail 8F190) DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-37858051 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d221.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039cdbc9d064d838fe056e1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-4-37858051 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Many thanks Andy. I'll see what the numbers say.=20 Mal, you are right that real two way QSOs may need high power and ERP but= surely all forms of experimentation at VLF are valid.=20 I also wonder about the (very small) amount of power that may be radiated= when using utilities assisted earth mode with signals conducted along pip= es for miles? Is there an easy way to estimate this radiated component?=20 73s Roger G3XBM Via my 2.4GHz handheld (iPod Touch 4g) On 18 Mar 2011, at 14:24, Andy Talbot wrote: > Here's an Excel S/S I did in the 73kHz days. Other people have updated= versions now, but it serves to get you into a region to design from - or= know when to not bother > =20 > http://www.g4jnt.com/DownLoad/MAGLOOP.XLS > Andy > www.g4jnt.com >=20 > =20 > On 18 March 2011 14:09, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has done the maths to work out what sort of ERP= could be expected at 8.97kHz with, say, 100W to a smallish loop antenna= in the garden?=20 >=20 > It would certainly avoid the need for very very large matching coils and= may be easier to engineer than a Marconi. Even an efficiency of -80dB wou= ld allow 1uW ERP and, judging by results from G3XIZ with around 2uW, this= could be useful with long stable carrier transmissions of several hours.= Most of us could run a loop with an area of 100sq m. with thickish wire= in our gardens. A loop might also be more practical for portable operatio= ns perhaps with a triangle with one high support. >=20 > Certainly my own results with WSPR at 136 and 500kHz with just a few wat= ts and quite thin wire and around 80sq m loop area were encouraging. Mind= you, 9kHz is very much lower than 136kHz, so the radiation resistance wou= ld be tiny I assume.=20 >=20 > 73s > Roger G3XBM >=20 > --=20 > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 >=20 --Apple-Mail-4-37858051 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Many thanks Andy. I'll see what the numbers say. 

Mal, you are right that real two way QSOs may need high power and ERP but surely all forms of experimentation at VLF are valid. 

I also wonder about the (very small) amount of power that may be radiated when using utilities assisted earth mode with signals conducted along pipes for miles? Is there an easy way to estimate this radiated component? 

73s
Roger G3XBM

Via my 2.4GHz handheld (iPod Touch 4g)

On 18 Mar 2011, at 14:24, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com> wrote:

Here's an Excel S/S I did in the 73kHz days.   Other people have updated versions now, but it serves to get you into a region to design from - or know when to not bother
 
Andy

 
On 18 March 2011 14:09, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has done the maths to work out what sort of ERP could be expected at 8.97kHz with, say, 100W to a smallish loop antenna in the garden?

It would certainly avoid the need for very very large matching coils and may be easier to engineer than a Marconi. Even an efficiency of -80dB would allow 1uW ERP and, judging by results from G3XIZ with around 2uW, this could be useful with long stable carrier transmissions of several hours. Most of us could run a loop with an area of 100sq m. with thickish wire in our gardens. A loop might also be more practical for portable operations perhaps with a triangle with one high support.

Certainly my own results with WSPR at 136 and 500kHz with just a few watts and quite thin wire and around 80sq m loop area were encouraging. Mind you, 9kHz is very much lower than 136kHz, so the radiation resistance would be tiny I assume.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088

--Apple-Mail-4-37858051--