Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.201]) by air-ma02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA023-b4f54d8b27e182; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:15:45 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 114E038000090; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:15:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2iUx-0008BB-SV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:14:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2iUx-0008B2-7i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:14:39 +0000 Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2iUw-0004TK-Bh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:14:39 +0000 Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p2OBEUsn003551 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:14:30 -0400 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id l.d9e.146f5b9c (43973) for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:14:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-de01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de01.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.168]) by cia-dd03.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIADD036-b2324d8b278e227; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:14:25 -0400 Received: from webmail-d038 (webmail-d038.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.87]) by smtprly-de01.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE017-b2324d8b278e227; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:14:22 -0400 References: <59F87B1BA5D04A2F98902CF94C38DB30@JimPC> <8CDB60EE4F8971C-1AD0-3512@webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com> <000001cbe86b$a741e790$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:14:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <000001cbe86b$a741e790$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33456-STANDARD Received: from 194.138.39.62 by webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.87) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:14:22 -0400 Message-Id: <8CDB82BC1CF597E-B4C-C058@webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: MarkusVester@aol.com X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_AOL_TAGS=0.281,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CDB82BC2EA9E0C_B4C_1B46D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_AOL_TAGS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94d8b27df7441 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ----------MB_8CDB82BC2EA9E0C_B4C_1B46D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Mal,=20 in our context, magnetic stimulation should not be a real problem. Around= 9 kHz, ICNIRP guidelines (which do include a large safety margin) allow= 24.4 A/m for occupational exposure and 5 A/m for the general public. A lo= op wire carrying 100 amps generates a very moderate 8 A/m at 1 m radial di= stance. On the other hand, 0.35 amps into my loading coil generates about= 4 A/m at 1 m from the axis.=20 Actual stimulation thresholds are typically two to three orders of magnitu= de higher. Using ear plugs, I inserted my head into the opening at the col= d (!) end of the coil for a few seconds. The magnetic field (approximately= 1000 A/m) produced no perceivable effect. Best regards, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: mal hamilton An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Verschickt: Mo., 21. Mrz. 2011, 19:54 Thema: Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF? Markus On health grounds I will leave loops alone. Your closing paragraph refers de mal/g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Markus Vester=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:42 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF? ... As the antenna is likely to be built in an inhabited area, you may also wa= nt to consider that magnetic fields are not shielded very well by most hou= sing construction materials. They will also penetrate our bodies, with an= (at least theoretical) possibility of nerve stimulation in the immediate= vicinity of very large AC currents. ...=20 ----------MB_8CDB82BC2EA9E0C_B4C_1B46D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Mal,
 
in our context, magnetic stimulation should not be a real proble= m. Around 9 kHz, ICNIRP guidelines (which do include a large safety= margin) allow 24.4 A/m for occupational exposure and 5 A/m for the genera= l public. A loop wire carrying 100 amps generates a very mo= derate 8 A/m at 1 m radial distance. On the other hand, 0.35 amps int= o my loading coil generates about 4 A/m at 1 m from the axis. 
 
Actual stimulation thresholds are typically two to three orders of ma= gnitude higher. Using ear plugs, I inserted my head into the ope= ning at the cold (!) end of the coil for a few seconds. The= magnetic field (approximately 1000 A/m) produced no perceivable= effect.

Best regards,
Markus (DF6NM)

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Mo., 21. Mrz. 2011, 19:54
Thema: Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antennas at VLF?

Markus
On health grounds I will leave loops alone. Your= closing paragraph refers
de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:42= PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loop TX antenn= as at VLF?

...
As the antenna is likely to be built in an inhabited area, you may al= so want to consider that magnetic fields are not shielded very well by mos= t housing construction materials. They will also penetrate our bodies, wit= h an (at least theoretical) possibility of nerve stimulation in the immedi= ate vicinity of very large AC currents.
... 
----------MB_8CDB82BC2EA9E0C_B4C_1B46D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com--