Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.75]) by air-da09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA092-86194d8b201ec4; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:42:38 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3A74D38000118; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:42:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2hyg-00082P-Oa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:41:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2hyf-00082G-Vy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:41:17 +0000 Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2hyd-0003sq-Rc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:41:17 +0000 Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p2OAf5Oi019607 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:41:05 -0400 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id l.106f.d9ea85 (55915) for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:41:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.169]) by cia-md07.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD072-b23b4d8b1fbb29; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:41:01 -0400 Received: from webmail-d038 (webmail-d038.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.87]) by smtprly-de02.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE026-b23b4d8b1fbb29; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:40:59 -0400 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:40:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33456-STANDARD Received: from 194.138.39.62 by webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.87) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:40:59 -0400 Message-Id: <8CDB82718FF0CEC-B4C-BB65@webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: MarkusVester@aol.com X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_AOL_TAGS=0.281,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CDB827190D5538_B4C_1AB0D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_AOL_TAGS, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604b4d8b20196b60 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ----------MB_8CDB827190D5538_B4C_1AB0D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Laurence, if I had only one to choose from, I'd definitely opt for the slowest "6000= 0" window at 47 uHz. Depending on antenna orientation, this would definite= ly give Scott a chance, or perhaps one of us over here. Would an onnidirec= tional E-field work as well for you as the RX loops? Running the second FFT for the Alphas nearly doubles the CPU load, so you= may want to skip that. Thanks for the great work! Best 73,=20 Markus -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Laurence KL7UK An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Verschickt: Mi., 23. Mrz. 2011, 15:34 Thema: RE: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline VLF pre Eu dawn signals are way down from mid winter Stefan, but that sign= ature increase on DHO38 signal between 0500 and 0700Z is still there. Look= s to me like a mid winter opportunity only on this 2 x Auroral oval path= at this range, but I could be mistaken. The loop is tensioned from moveme= nt by an ice screw in the lake and given the increasing temps Im sure it= will come dislodged sooner than later - the other side is tensioned to a= Birch tree so I dont think it will move. If Scott warms up his #2 Ill hav= e to get someone to turn the array as hes in a Cosine null at the moment. =20 Ill take a look at the processor and see what gives but welcome any direct= ion on speeds/fft longterm so I can leave one or two screens up longer ter= m without frying the proc..=20 =20 Not sure if Ill be in the same location by next winter :-(( Your going to= have to work out how to get an antennae up and stable in the latter part= of the of the Eu night for this path to work me thinks :-))) =20 Cheers Laurence KL7UK, Wasilla Alaska remote op'd from /5 Oklahoma =20 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:24:25 +0100 From: schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline Hello Laurence,=20 No hope for the end of the season? Maybe you are right, unfortunately. But= you'll come back in the next season, isn't it? :-) Or maybe just reducing= to wideband and 6000 or so? A pity... But thanks for the service and the intersting location to watch and sharin= g the optimism!! Maybe we'll see what can be done in Greenland, that's a next step into you= r direction, about... 73 and good luck,=20 Stefan/ EI/DK7FC =20 =20 =3D=20 ----------MB_8CDB827190D5538_B4C_1AB0D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Hi Laurence,
 
if I had only one to choose from, I'd definitely opt for th= e slowest "60000" window at 47 uHz. Depending on antenna orientation, this= would definitely give Scott a chance, or perhaps one of us over here= . Would an onnidirectional E-field work as well for you as the RX loo= ps?
 
Running the second FFT for the Alphas nearly doubles the CPU load,&nb= sp;so you may want to skip that.
 
Thanks for the great work!
 
Best 73, 
Markus

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Laurence KL7UK <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Mi., 23. Mrz. 2011, 15:34
Thema: RE: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline

VLF pre Eu dawn signals are way down from mid winter Stefan, but that sign= ature increase on DHO38 signal between 0500 and 0700Z is still= there. Looks to me like a mid winter opportunity only on this 2 x Au= roral oval path at this range, but I could be mistaken. The loop is tensio= ned from movement by an ice screw in the lake and given the increasin= g temps Im sure it will come dislodged sooner than later - the other side= is tensioned to a Birch tree so I dont think it will move. If Scott= warms up his #2 Ill have to get someone to turn the array as hes in a&nbs= p;Cosine null at the moment.
 
Ill take a look at the processor and see what gives but welcome any= direction on speeds/fft longterm so I can leave one or two screens up lon= ger term without frying the proc..
 
Not sure if Ill be in the same location by next winter :-(( Your going to= have to work out how to get an antennae up and stable in the latter part= of the of the Eu night for this path to work me thinks :-)))  
Cheers
Laurence KL7UK, Wasilla Alaska  remote op'd from /5 Oklahoma
 
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:24:25 +0100
From: schaefer@iup.uni-h= eidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blackshe= ep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline

Hello Laurence,

No hope for the end of the season? Maybe you are right, unfortunately. But= you'll come back in the next season, isn't it? :-) Or maybe just reducing= to wideband and 6000 or so? A pity...
But thanks for the service and the intersting location to watch and sharin= g the optimism!!
Maybe we'll see what can be done in Greenland, that's a next step into you= r direction, about...

73 and good luck,

Stefan/ EI/DK7FC
 
 
=3D
----------MB_8CDB827190D5538_B4C_1AB0D_webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com--