Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.202]) by air-dc08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC081-86044d8b87411d1; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:02:41 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B11C1380005D5; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2oqF-0000Td-6v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:01:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q2oqE-0000TU-J4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:01:02 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2oqD-0002zj-Es for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:01:02 +0000 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2OI0wNY022658 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:01:00 +0100 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2OI0vMR015826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:00:57 +0100 Received: from [129.206.196.234] (vpn234a.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.196.234]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p2OI0sMh017403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:00:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4D8B86E7.20602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:01:11 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8CDB82718FF0CEC-B4C-BB65@webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <8CDB82718FF0CEC-B4C-BB65@webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000302060001020005050205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca4d8b87382b49 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------000302060001020005050205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id p2OI0wNY022658 Hi Laurence, Markus, VLF, Hmmmm, about the 60000 windows, Paul Nicholson means.... (see a part of=20 our emails below) Am 19.03.2011 09:41, schrieb Paul: > Hi Stefan, > > > Well, you see people are running slower and slower windows, > > such as "DFCW-60000" > > There is a limit set by the variability of the path length. > > For example, see > > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/110319a.gif > > This shows the absolute phase of NAA at 24kHz over a great > circle distance of 4672km. The graph spans 5 and a bit days. > During the day the phase advances because the D-layer height > falls from about 90km to 70km. The pattern repeats each day > with the night-time phase (path length) pretty much the same > each night, but the daytime path varies. > > The path change between day and night is almost a complete > cycle at 24kHz, so we might expect 100 to 120 degrees at 9kHz. > > The value of a long coherent integration will be significantly > reduced if the phase changes by more than 30 or 40 deg. > If the phase changes by more than 90 deg, a long integration > will be worse than a shorter one. Maybe "60000" is better anyway, as seen between DJ8WX or OE5ODL and=20 TF3HZ. Anyway i would start with a faster mode and go for a slower, if=20 nothing is visible. It's your dicision, Laurence :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 24.03.2011 11:40, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Laurence, > if I had only one to choose from, I'd definitely opt for the slowest=20 > "60000" window at 47 uHz. Depending on antenna orientation, this would= =20 > definitely give Scott a chance, or perhaps one of us over here. Would=20 > an onnidirectional E-field work as well for you as the RX loops? > Running the second FFT for the Alphas nearly doubles the CPU load, so=20 > you may want to skip that. > Thanks for the great work! > Best 73, > Markus > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Laurence KL7UK > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Verschickt: Mi., 23. Mrz. 2011, 15:34 > Thema: RE: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline > > VLF pre Eu dawn signals are way down from mid winter Stefan, but that=20 > signature increase on DHO38 signal between 0500 and 0700Z is still=20 > there. Looks to me like a mid winter opportunity only on this 2 x=20 > Auroral oval path at this range, but I could be mistaken. The loop is=20 > tensioned from movement by an ice screw in the lake and given the=20 > increasing temps Im sure it will come dislodged sooner than later -=20 > the other side is tensioned to a Birch tree so I dont think it will=20 > move. If Scott warms up his #2 Ill have to get someone to turn the=20 > array as hes in a Cosine null at the moment. > > Ill take a look at the processor and see what gives but welcome any=20 > direction on speeds/fft longterm so I can leave one or two screens up=20 > longer term without frying the proc.. > > Not sure if Ill be in the same location by next winter :-(( Your going= =20 > to have to work out how to get an antennae up and stable in the latter= =20 > part of the of the Eu night for this path to work me thinks :-))) > > Cheers > Laurence KL7UK, Wasilla Alaska remote op'd from /5 Oklahoma > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:24:25 +0100 > From: schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de=20 > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline > > Hello Laurence, > > No hope for the end of the season? Maybe you are right, unfortunately.= =20 > But you'll come back in the next season, isn't it? :-) Or maybe just=20 > reducing to wideband and 6000 or so? A pity... > But thanks for the service and the intersting location to watch and=20 > sharing the optimism!! > Maybe we'll see what can be done in Greenland, that's a next step into= =20 > your direction, about... > > 73 and good luck, > > Stefan/ EI/DK7FC > > > > =3D --------------000302060001020005050205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id p2OI0wNY022658 Hi Laurence, Markus, VLF,

Hmmmm, about the 60000 windows, Paul Nicholson means.... (see a part of our emails below)

Am 19.03.2011 09:41, schrieb Paul:
Hi Stefan,

> Well, you see people are running slower and slower windows,
> such as "DFCW-60000"

There is a limit set by the variability of the path length.

For example, see

=C2=A0http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/110= 319a.gif

This shows the absolute phase of NAA at 24kHz over a great
circle distance of 4672km.=C2=A0=C2=A0 The graph spans 5 and a bit days.=
During the day the phase advances because the D-layer height
falls from about 90km to 70km.=C2=A0=C2=A0 The pattern repeats each day with the night-time phase (path length) pretty much the same
each night, but the daytime path varies.

The path change between day and night is almost a complete
cycle at 24kHz, so we might expect 100 to 120 degrees at 9kHz.

The value of a long coherent integration will be significantly
reduced if the phase changes by more than 30 or 40 deg.
If the phase changes by more than 90 deg, a long integration
will be worse than a shorter one.

Maybe "60000" is better anyway, as seen between DJ8WX or OE5ODL and TF3HZ. Anyway i would start with a faster mode and go for a slower, if nothing is visible. It's your dicision, Laurence :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 24.03.2011 11:40, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Laurence,
=C2=A0
if I had only one to=C2=A0choose from, I'd definitely=C2=A0opt for= the slowest "60000" window at 47 uHz. Depending on antenna orientation, this would definitely give Scott=C2=A0a chance, or perhaps one of us over here.=C2=A0Would an onnidirectional E-field work as well for you as the RX loops?
=C2=A0
Running the second FFT for the Alphas nearly doubles the CPU load,=C2=A0so you may=C2=A0want to=C2=A0skip that.
=C2=A0
Thanks for the great work!
=C2=A0
Best 73,=C2=A0
Markus

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Laurence KL7UK <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Mi., 23. Mrz. 2011, 15:34
Thema: RE: LF: Wasilla Alaska VLF - offline