Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.133]) by air-de03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE031-5eaa4d78c78f15b; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:43:59 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0BD9E38000412; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:43:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PxfCe-0003C1-S4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:42:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PxfCe-0003Bs-ER for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:42:52 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PxfCd-0000Rf-J7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:42:52 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p2ACgoZ7012005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:42:50 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p2ACgoq1014890 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4D78C721.6000207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:42:09 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: GRABBER Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090309090105030604070000" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40854d78c78c7cc6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------090309090105030604070000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Henny, Uwe, VLF, Ah, you've already seen it ;-) I just wanted to post that i have splitted my 60000 window. Now the range arround 8970.000 +- 4 uHz and 8970.020...8970.025 is visible. Since it has stored the last 10 days or so in the buffer, DJ8WX's transmission of last week is now visible in 47 uHz as well. Uwe, what is the exact frequency on which you are transmitting? What is the original reference frequency and what is the divider ratio? May there be a conflict with Hennys transmission? Now we are in a range where it is important to know the frequency to a uHz! If i look at Victor's spectrogram, it looks Henny is slightly below 8970.022 Hz, maybe 0.2 mHz. But this may be not enough to make out the difference (?) Oh, i just looked at the spectrogram and see a faint trace at 8970.0217 Hz. Is it you, Henny? It's still to much guesswork but a first step on the way to a proper ID. 3 dB QRO would be a good way to check that :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 10.03.2011 13:11, schrieb henny van elst: > Hi Stefan, > tu for the 60000grabber, > i will keep the tx on, > henny pa3cpm > best 73's to All. --------------090309090105030604070000 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Henny, Uwe, VLF,

Ah, you've already seen it ;-)
I just wanted to post that i have splitted my 60000 window. Now the range arround 8970.000 +- 4 uHz and 8970.020...8970.025 is visible.
Since it has stored the last 10 days or so in the buffer, DJ8WX's transmission of last week is now visible in 47 uHz as well.

Uwe, what is the exact frequency on which you are transmitting? What is the original reference frequency and what is the divider ratio?

May there be a conflict with Hennys transmission? Now we are in a range where it is important to know the frequency to a uHz! If i look at Victor's spectrogram, it looks Henny is slightly below 8970.022 Hz, maybe 0.2 mHz. But this may be not enough to make out the difference (?) Oh, i just looked at the spectrogram and see a faint trace at 8970.0217 Hz. Is it you, Henny? It's still to much guesswork but a first step on the way to a proper ID. 3 dB QRO would be a good way to check that :-)



73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 10.03.2011 13:11, schrieb henny van elst:
Hi Stefan,
 
tu for the 60000grabber,
i will keep the tx on,
henny pa3cpm
best 73's to All.
--------------090309090105030604070000--