Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.77]) by air-me08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME081-8bbc4d4a461b324; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:07:23 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 61A523800009C; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 01:07:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PksKQ-0006eF-38 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:06:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PksKP-0006e6-9d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:06:01 +0000 Received: from mail-pv0-f171.google.com ([74.125.83.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PksKN-00029h-CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:06:01 +0000 Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so142052pvg.16 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:05:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rhhEKxf52PmZom2CfiTCe0nWmhBz+opwTrbkpqVwcXE=; b=sIT2bWYn6JGSbroFkon3v5ZIyR3IRGMc00deNMuzyGuYlU1aw1qjTFawrjH6QxQPv/ 5Y6csWqJfx3NQem2+GVn9XMXK5vU8UyMD5NFqZxIPSrp5W6RyOdoJb1og3ln3q0oys/V qaQu1paKU5bmtnRbtS3cHE2lPlyK8O3EHuucA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RT5TYS7rGioRuQ0GtlSX6byKvMLHqnxthX4AyTGd1FcU1Z2ccZ2HzqG4jxsHf97ILb uKJ6FbcqY0jJjseLwz9hbVcjKZ5vtHbMMZxNuR7jou6bO9jguZGH9hZKqZUVp0/s7FOE Ip03K/ZcAOZ8Z03GGEqaKzXeK3wwXo3C7YCLI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.153.8 with SMTP id a8mr9695342wfe.349.1296713151860; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:05:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.13.11 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:05:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D49BFFA.5030209@kpnmail.nl> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:05:51 +0100 Message-ID: From: HB9ASB To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: HE3OM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd20b20cad4c2049b5a8e4b X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m269.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604d4d4a46195b6c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --000e0cd20b20cad4c2049b5a8e4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Rik and Jim and thank you very much for the interesting QSO's. Hope to rise more activity Friday. It was a big pleasure to contact you gain after such a long time. Where are all these LF stations from the old days? All doing WSPR or 9kHz? 73 de Toni 2011/2/2 Rik Strobbe > Hello Jan, > > I announced "xband" at the beginnening and end of the QSO. > Toni was listening on a 30m untuned wire and I got a 419 report. > His report was 559 on my 600m antenna (the 138.8kHz signal was S9+20dB). > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [ > owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens pa3abk [pa3abk@kpnmail.nl] > Verzonden: woensdag 2 februari 2011 21:35 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: HE3OM > > FB Rik, > Took some time I realized it was crossband... Listening deep into the > noise and staring into SpecLab for any trace... > He also scanned 80 and 40 but up till now not retuned to 600m. > His 137kHz sigs are vy good here, inspite of the untuned antenna. Trust > he will once attend 600m again. :-) > Jan/pa3abk > > Op 2-2-2011 20:44, Rik Strobbe schreef: > > > > All, > > > > HE3OM is calling CQ on 137.5kHz right now (19:45 UTC). Just worked > > Toni crossband 137.5/502 kHz. > > > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > > > -- > pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it > --000e0cd20b20cad4c2049b5a8e4b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Rik and Jim
and thank you very much for the interesting QSO's= . Hope to rise more activity Friday. It was a big pleasure to contact you= gain after such a long time. Where are all these LF stations from the old= days? All doing WSPR or 9kHz?
73 de Toni
=A0

2011/2/2 Rik Strobbe= <Rik.= Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
Hello Jan,

I announced "xband" at the beginnening and end of the QSO.
Toni was listening on a 30m untuned wire and I got a 419 report.
His report was 559 on my 600m antenna (the 138.8kHz signal was S9+20dB).
73, Rik =A0ON7YD - OR7T


________________________________________
Van: owner-rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens pa3abk [pa3abk@kpnmail.nl]
Verzonden: woensdag 2 februari 2011 21:35
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksh= eep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: HE3OM

FB Rik,
Took some time I realized it was crossband... Listening deep into the
noise and staring into SpecLab for any trace...
He also scanned 80 and 40 but up till now not retuned to 600m.
His =A0137kHz sigs are vy good here, inspite of the untuned antenna. Trust=
he will once attend 600m again. =A0:-)
Jan/pa3abk

Op 2-2-2011 20:44, Rik Strobbe schreef:
>
> All,
>
> HE3OM is calling CQ on 137.5kHz right now (19:45 UTC). Just worked > Toni crossband 137.5/502 kHz.
>
> 73, Rik =A0ON7YD - OR7T
>


--
pa3abk<-> =A0dordrecht jo21it

--000e0cd20b20cad4c2049b5a8e4b--