Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.25]) by air-ma03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA031-b4f74d4d08cf28c; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:22:39 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 15FE538000106; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:22:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PldOt-0007tT-Tq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:21:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PldOt-0007tK-Fe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:21:47 +0000 Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PldOr-0006LL-Iw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:21:47 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so3482086bwz.16 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:21:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rSPmwKH2qmf7IYzDtFKzfHbqsXuxZG7Vc6KD2BAERFI=; b=Xvb8xWJEF1zf19M4musgnTLW326/aptopbMs6pLxfQ4yxefA/t47O/aZHb8YfCoKyF uuE75kq181vjKuomEsXIIKsdfD5v4J9MQFlIDT3LB9hz4G/T1E+GU2KbQZpzrieTENjf nQ/mwD8+mgJ7h69wwcFp7IZOIjgbOlGjF1GgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AbAVr8xuKM/VdzdmS63zTMYN5YvDFatyrb/hhR/1VAUy/p09GucBkmQOCA5QKYHA7D kF5MNvGVl39JyGnNYA3LryQZ2VcU6fN3PVjWodvfi0COSZN0kNT5CZvPsw5dO7pEpMmY fEQ8gnMMY4p6L4PCwdR3ugnbrKrtrBu1Anf18= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.62.209 with SMTP id y17mr466555bkh.98.1296894099378; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.180.144 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 00:21:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D4C7006.1020904@freenet.de> References: <4D4C7006.1020904@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:21:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Chris Gomoiu To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: New transmitter on 26 kHz in Israel ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d26c921ad242049b84b04c X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m018.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41194d4d08cd1466 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0016e6d26c921ad242049b84b04c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Wolf, VLF, I've been running my VLF grabber for a while at 92kc/s and I can confirm the 26kHz transmission was the strongest signal ever received here http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10280270/capt_DFCW-600_wide189.jpg I have only a small E-field probe antenna optimized for the 9kHz dreamer's band so can't contribute any DF information than already available in the thread you've mentioned. Now back to 48kc/s sample rate for tomorrow DK7FC VLF experiment. 73s Chris 4X1RF On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:30 PM, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > Greetings all, > There seems to be a new transmitter being set up at the moment. It only > operates occasionally, but quite strong here when it's "on". Some > speculation in the VLF group about the exact location: > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/message/16955?l=1 > > Since we have at least one keen VLF experimenter from that area in this > group... if you have a loop antenna, can we have a bearing towards that > "unknown" transmitter ? > > Cheers, > Wolf DL4YHF . > > > --0016e6d26c921ad242049b84b04c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Wolf, VLF,
=A0
I've been running my VLF grabber for a while at 92kc/s and I can= confirm the 26kHz transmission was the strongest signal ever received her= e h= ttp://dl.dropbox.com/u/10280270/capt_DFCW-600_wide189.jpg
=A0
I have only a small E-field probe antenna optimized for the 9kHz drea= mer's band so can't contribute any DF information than already ava= ilable in the thread you've mentioned. Now back to 48kc/s sample rate= for tomorrow DK7FC VLF experiment.
=A0
73s
Chris 4X1RF


=A0
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:30 PM, wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de= > wrote:
Greetings all,
There seems= to be a new transmitter being set up at the moment. It only operates occa= sionally, but quite strong here when it's "on". Some specula= tion in the VLF group about the exact location:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/mess= age/16955?l=3D1

Since we have at least one keen VLF experimente= r from that area in this group... if you have a loop antenna, can we have= a bearing towards that "unknown" transmitter ?

Cheers,
=A0Wolf DL4YHF .


=

--0016e6d26c921ad242049b84b04c--