Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.220]) by air-db02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB024-86964d4af5f4323; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:37:40 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AA23438000092; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:37:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pl42b-0000XU-1i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:36:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pl42a-0000XL-4j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:36:24 +0000 Received: from filter02.i-online.fr ([195.200.78.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl42Y-0008Nn-PG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:36:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com ([195.200.78.13]) by filter02.i-online.fr (IceWarp 10.0.7 (2010-02-10)) with ESMTP (SSL) id MUN58304 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:36:04 +0100 Received: (qmail 30124 invoked by uid 507); 3 Feb 2011 19:36:02 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.103?) (john.rabson@numeo.fr@217.67.155.178) by smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2011 19:36:02 +0100 From: John Rabson Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:36:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Message-Id: <6156A530-183D-4560-9CC1-3F2EE72300EC@numeo.fr> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-23-623393048 Subject: Re: LF: Earth-mode or not earth-mode X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40dc4d4af5f070b3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror --Apple-Mail-23-623393048 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Roger, Yes, this is the place to tell people about VLF work. Although the title= of the reflector refers to LF, there is a lot of traffic about 500 kHz,= and other frequencies when relevant. As these involved in caving and tunnel communications know well, this part= of the spectrum has many uses - it is not necessarily a question of how= many countries you can work. 73 John F5VLF On 3 Feb 2011, at 18:12CET, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > Thanks for feedback and questions from Rik, Chris, Mal, Stefan and other= s on and off this list.=20 >=20 > I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me why, if this is (mainly)= conduction along metal pipes, which I am sure it is, best results are not= obtained with a galvanic connection to the pipe at each end and why best= receive results are with an E-field probe. I remain puzzled. Answers plea= se! >=20 > May I reply on a few general points raised by some? >=20 > What is the definition of earth-mode? >=20 > I could not find one, but my understanding is "communication between two= points essentially using conduction through the ground". In the modern wo= rld it is almost impossible to find anywhere, except remote moors, that is= not criss-crossed with buried cables and pipes. My interpretation of eart= h-mode therefore includes utilising these as a means of helping a signal= get from (a) to (b). Hence my term "utilities assisted earth-mode". In mi= ning and military use of earth-mode I think this is also accepted. What I= also mean is communicating from (a) to (b) not using a radiated signal or= induction as the prime means of propagation.=20 >=20 > Why experiment with this form of VLF/ULF communication?=20 >=20 > From my tests last year it was clear that local communication "piggy-bac= king" on these buried utilities seemed to be possible over many kilometres= without the need for large and complex antenna systems that are essential= to get even a tiny VLF signal actually radiated, as Ossi, Gerhard, Stefan= and Chris know only too well.=20 >=20 > Questions I'm trying to answer are: > How best to launch a signal? > What in the ground (apart from water, soil and rock) helps the signal ge= t from (a) to (b)? > What works best to pick up the VLF/ULF signal at the far end of the link= ? > What frequencies work best? > What are the noise sources and how can these be minimised? > How close to buried utilities does one really have to be for it to work? > Can one use rivers, canals or the sea coast for earth-mode?=20 > How little/much power is needed for a given range? > What modes are most effective? > What is the practical range limit? > Is there a practical use for this form of communication? > Also, I'd welcome suggestions for further practical tests. A lot of the= experience is directly useful in the reception of DX radiated VLF signals= .=20 >=20 > Results have been shared here because others are known to be interested= in this aspect of VLF work, but if people think the LF-reflector is not= the right place please say so.=20 >=20 >=20 > 73s > Roger G3XBM >=20 > --=20 > g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > www.g3xbm.co.uk > www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --Apple-Mail-23-623393048 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Roger,

Yes, this is the place to tell people about VLF work.  Although the= title of the reflector refers to LF, there is a lot of traffic about 500= kHz, and other frequencies when relevant.

As the= se involved in caving and tunnel communications know well, this part of th= e spectrum has many uses - it is not necessarily a question of how many co= untries you can work.

73
John F5VLF

On 3 Feb 2011, at 18:12CET, Roger Lapthorn wrote:
Thanks= for feedback and questions from Rik, Chris, Mal, Stefan and others on and= off this list.

I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me= why, if this is (mainly) conduction along metal pipes, which I am sure it= is, best results are not obtained with a galvanic connection to th= e pipe at each end and why best receive results are with an E-field probe.= I remain puzzled. Answers please!

May I reply on a few general points raised by some?

What is the definition of earth-mode?

I could not find one, but my understanding is "communication= between two points essentially using conduction through the ground".= In the modern world it is almost impossible to find anywhere, except remo= te moors, that is not criss-crossed with buried cables and pipes. My inter= pretation of earth-mode therefore includes utilising these as a means of= helping a signal get from (a) to (b). Hence my term "utilities assisted= earth-mode". In mining and military use of earth-mode I think this is als= o accepted. What I also mean is communicating from (a) to (b) not= using a radiated signal or induction as the prime means of propaga= tion.

Why experiment with this form of VLF/ULF communication? =

From my tests last year it was clear that local communication "pig= gy-backing" on these buried utilities seemed to be possible over many kilo= metres without the need for large and complex antenna systems that are ess= ential to get even a tiny VLF signal actually radiated, as Ossi, Ge= rhard, Stefan and Chris know only too well.

Questions I'm trying to answer are:
=20
  • How best to launch a signal?
  • What in the ground (apart from water, soil and rock) helps the signal= get from (a) to (b)?
  • What works best to pick up the VLF/ULF signa= l at the far end of the link?
  • What frequencies work best?
  • What are the noise sources and how can these be minimised?
  • How= close to buried utilities does one really have to be for it to work?
  • Can one use rivers, canals or the sea coast for earth-mode?
  • <= li>How little/much power is needed for a given range?
  • What modes= are most effective?
  • What is the practical range limit?
  • Is= there a practical use for this form of communication?
Also, I'd welcome suggestions for furthe= r practical tests.  A lot of the exper= ience is directly useful in the reception of DX radiated VLF signal= s.

Results have been shared here because others are known to be intereste= d in this aspect of VLF work, but if people think the LF-reflector is n= ot the right place please say so.


73s
Roger G3XBM

g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
www.youtub= e.com/user/g3xbm
= G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088

=3D --Apple-Mail-23-623393048--