Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dj05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dj05.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.19.187.141]) by air-da06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA061-85e84d5bd52c2f4; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:46:20 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dj05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2305038000095; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:46:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PphgQ-00077V-48 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:44:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PphgP-00077L-GN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:44:41 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PphgO-0000iJ-1K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:44:41 +0000 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p1GDicRJ017600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:44:38 +0100 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1GDibBM009181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:44:37 +0100 Received: from [147.142.13.60] (vpn513-060.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [147.142.13.60]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p1GDibUY029510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:44:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4D5BD4D1.5020405@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:44:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <006301cbcd3a$cd0364a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <009101cbcd4f$81d98da0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <70ED8F4523F743C399A3F88C9F870D62@JimPC> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: TA TONITE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090509080704060202080106" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039cdbc9d0a4d5bd5224a3b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --------------090509080704060202080106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Toni, Am 16.02.2011 14:08, schrieb HB9ASB: > Thanks Rik > I've read somewhere that DCF39 has 40kW EIRP. So we would have around > 4W EIRP. Last week a station measured our field strength, 100km away > and came to 0.4WEIRP. This is probably a little bit to low. Anyway, it > shows me again, that most amateurs overestimate their ERP. Even Mal > has probably not the Watt he claims ;-) > 73 de Toni Yes, maybe that applies for me too ;-) BTW, Toni, i would like to try a sked on 137/137 in CW from JN49IS36VH with you if you are interested. When do you have to make QRT on that antenna? Can't you ask them just to let the antenna arranged as it is, for amateur purposes!? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------090509080704060202080106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Toni,

Am 16.02.2011 14:08, schrieb HB9ASB:
Thanks Rik
I've read somewhere that DCF39 has 40kW EIRP. So we would have around 4W EIRP. Last week a station measured our field strength, 100km away and came to 0.4WEIRP. This is probably a little bit to low. Anyway, it shows me again, that most amateurs overestimate their ERP. Even Mal has probably not the Watt he claims ;-)
73 de Toni

Yes, maybe that applies for me too ;-)
BTW, Toni, i would like to try a sked on 137/137 in CW from JN49IS36VH with you if you are interested. When do you have to make QRT on that antenna? Can't you ask them just to let the antenna arranged as it is, for amateur purposes!? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------090509080704060202080106--