Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.205]) by air-mc05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMC052-a9684d69110f1d6; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:41:19 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 91A3E38000081; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:41:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PtLJa-00087v-4i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:40:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PtLJZ-00087m-GW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:40:09 +0000 Received: from smtpout05.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.77] helo=email.aon.at) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLJW-0002P7-QR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:40:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 16259 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 14:40:00 -0000 Received: from 188-23-182-0.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([188.23.182.0]) (envelope-sender ) by smarthub91.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Feb 2011 14:39:58 -0000 From: Gerhard Hickl To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4D690B71.1020804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <4D68D907.1000005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1298717758.4379.2.camel@gerhard-desktop> <483B525F6C7E42D1B5D226AB3E96611D@White> <4D690B71.1020804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:39:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1298731197.1548.15.camel@gerhard-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: VLF: OE5ODL,OE3GHB and DF6NM on 8970 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd4d69110d2558 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Since about 11:00z, I'm using DHO38 as a reference for my carrier on 8969.98. As it can be seen on your grabber, frequency is stable. I'm using a 3,5mH surplus DCF77-Ferrite rod (20cm by 1cm) resonated to roughly 22kHz with a 15nF capacitor. GQD on 21,4kHz also could be received by this system. Coupling to sound-card is done by a secondary winding of about 30turns. No active parts required. Just fed into the Mic-Input. The ferrite-antenna is in the garage where the Notebook is and about 5m away from the loading coil. DHO is about 20db over noise in the wide-band-view 0-24kHz when the rod is properly adjusted. GQD is about the same. So in case DHO is on "breakfast-brake", GQD could be used. 73 OE3GHB Gerhard Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 15:17 +0100 schrieb Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer: > Markus, VLF, >=20 >=20 > Am 26.02.2011 14:27, schrieb Markus Vester:=20 > > DHO 23.4 kHz is received simultaneously by a small ferrite antenna > > to lock the TX samplerate. >=20 > Maybe this should be pointed out a little more detailed. > While it was a quasi common thinking in the last months, that it is > impossible to receive a VLF MSK transmitter (like DHO38 or GQD) during > transmitting below 9 kHz (due to the very high field strengths near > the TX coil and wire), your and Gerhard's experiments show that it is > possible indeed, if a resonated ferrite antenna is used. I've built > the same and can receive DHO38 at 20 dB SNR in 3 Hz. The attenuation > of a 9 kHz signal against 23.4 kHz is about 40 dB. The dynamic range > of the soundcard allows another 80 dB before overload occurs. > Additionally there is a very narrow directivity of this antenna (-10 > dB at +-30 deg).=20 >=20 > The few VLF transmitting stations may use this method as an > alternative to a GPS locked VFO, if SpecLab is used to generate the TX > frequency. I will use this antenna as a redundant system to lock my > VFO in the next experiment. Maybe there are some advantages regarding > EMC. > RX stations may use this method too since the strongest MSK > transmitter can be choosen, even if the RX loop antenna points into > another direction! (Stereo mode necessary) >=20 > A photo of my simple ferrite RX antenna for DHO38 is here: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/DHO38%20ferrite%20RX%20antenna.JPG > 34.3 nF is used to resonate to 23.4 kHz. The output winding has about > 25 turns while the primary has about 200 turns. >=20 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >=20 >=20 > > Markus (DF6NM) > > =20 > >=20 > >=20 > > From: Gerhard Hickl=20 > > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 11:55 AM > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 > > Subject: Re: VLF: OE5ODL and OE3GHB active on 8970 Hz > >=20 > >=20 > > Hi Stefan and group! > >=20 > > In the moment I'm running on GPS-Sync and will switch to DHO38-Lock > > in a few minutes. I'm curious about the stability. > >=20 > > Antenna-current is as usual about 550-580mA. > >=20 > > Beside my plan to run a QRSS10 X-Band QSO with OK2BVG soon, no > > further plans right now. > >=20 > > 73 > >=20 > > OE3GHB > > Gerhard > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 11:42 +0100 schrieb Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer: > > LF, > >=20 > > The season is slowly passing, the average QRN is significantly > > rising. But today the QRN is low and both Austrian VLF TX stations > > are transmitting. OE3GHB is about 15 dB above noise in 424 uHz on > > 8969.98 Hz. > >=20 > > Some new projects on your side? There's not much activity these > > days... > >=20 > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >=20 > >=20 > >=20