Message-ID: <006b01cbcba8$2f5ba2f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <4D57E264.24047.320135@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:02:31 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Eu DX frequency
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


More FICTION, comical and not TRUE. Which grabbers display 136.318
???????????
g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 1:53 PM
Subject: LF: Eu DX frequency


> There was no =change= from 136.318kHz to 136.177kHz. The latter
> frequency was suggested as an alternative to fix a problem on a
> particular path, and most stations went along with it. Many grabbers
> are set up to receive both sub-bands, so either could be used for
> beacons.
>
> In the case of skeds, the two stations can use whatever frequency
> they like, provided they do not cause QRM to other users of the band.
>
> Anyone who has argued strongly in the past that grabbers could be
> used for cheating should perhaps use non-standard frequencies to
> avoid criticism of their own QSOs.
>
> Mike, G3XDV
> ==========
>