Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.193.74]) by air-me05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME051-8bb04d388117273; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:38:15 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 279A4380000E4; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:38:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PfzNi-0000Jn-U2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:37:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PfzNi-0000Je-2v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:37:14 +0000 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([79.133.160.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PfzNf-0006oS-Dh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:37:14 +0000 Received: from pc486.home.ru (host168.161-133-79.sotline.ru [79.133.161.168]) by mx.omskcity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0KIb0uV001744 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:37:01 +0600 (OMST) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by pc486.home.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA00314 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:39:22 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: pc486.home.ru: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:39:21 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4D371ADB.1070405@freenet.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5 (mx.omskcity.com [79.133.160.2]); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:37:04 +0600 (OMST) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Pic or Atmel? Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14a4d38811576b2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Stefan, Wolf On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > - ATmegas, even the tiniest ones, have a much nicer instruction set > (compared with 14-bit PIC core) and are thus more suited for compiled > languages like "C". BTW using FpGA from Xilinx or Altera anybody can easy build CPU with any instruction set you like. Whith all perepheral devices (and RAM) in the same crystall. It's my favorit 'toy' now :-) What about Atmel and Microchip it seems to me better chip is chip you familar :-) Another essential difference is absent. Regards, Alex/RA9MB