Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.223]) by air-da10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA103-86424d24ec341d; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:09:56 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7AF1138000106; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:09:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PabXX-0000qv-S4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:09:07 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PabXX-0000qm-Af for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:09:07 +0000 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PabXV-0006oN-6U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:09:07 +0000 Received: by iyj21 with SMTP id 21so14759710iyj.16 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:08:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MnpRHAZNRxUpd6/T5FbQR7esKcHtVYIA6WkspddZxf4=; b=CDpBxxB9ysh7v8uvcLouq5B4ZBV0o0pO4T6bpOHmYC+kHKw/EMEYDC3LLDp/Iinhfh f7e/ceiEuBiCQAzVWFEIEyak6voqjHznuhv7GK22gVfPnvfO8OlpVjfcKfOnuIbcCexz abJJMhPs9DH5P/011Gkb+bQ3UDRUZZmExxYuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VpMhj1XotDdgcCX5gS0mpwfHFFuGAzjfhxYJzzoF3xhorWHKsqA59gR2asNW7IK+Y4 aOo9eXc4cTQLJjoQrIGKVMlKp5BB4kdl2DHbxPs3zsNKXJZuds+2erO8ABxOSq4Kwtta xxLAeE6OTFsx4eEdWRRyPBXDHT0MoJEn+TEuA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.223.136 with SMTP id ik8mr23220028icb.484.1294265338343; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.239.5 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:08:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0C7C445EE1AB420597A4B79BB0095C22@home2361108df7> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:08:58 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: 137kHz WSPR - reports appreciated [maybe...] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30549df5bcb259049920a1b4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d012.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40df4d24ec320a63 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --20cf30549df5bcb259049920a1b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dave Well I was transmitting in that timeslot and the frequency is very close. It would be good to get a decode at that range as the best ever so far is 148km. 73s Roger G3XBM On 5 January 2011 21:57, Dave G3WCB. wrote: > Well......I think that I can see something that isn't G8IMR. There's a > faint > trace in the second half of the 21 40 period on 137.550. Andy is on > 137.530. > See attached screen grab. > > It's a bit clearer on the oroginal screen grab, which is too big to post > here. > > Roger, does that correspond with one of your transmit periods? > > 73, Dave G3WCB > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Martin Evans > Sent: 05 January 2011 21:50 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - reports appreciated > > > > > > > You only need approximate time sync - a second or two is good enough. > > > > 'JNT > > > Oh what fun! > > Got the clock on the synched puter up, trying to get the clock on the duff > puter matched up. > > Harder than it sounds! > > Anyway, the signal that I can see is G8IMR at -21dB. > > Sorry Roger. > > Martin GW3UCJ Swansea. > > > > -- g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ www.g3xbm.co.uk www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 --20cf30549df5bcb259049920a1b4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave

Well I was transmitting in that timeslot and the frequency= is very close. It would be good to get a decode at that range as the best= ever so far is 148km.

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 5 January 2011 21:57, Dave G3WCB. <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>= wrote:
Well......I think that I can see something that isn't G8IMR. There'= ;s a faint
trace in the second half of the 21 40 period on 137.550. Andy is on 137.53= 0.
See attached screen grab.

It's a bit clearer on the oroginal screen grab, which is too big to po= st
here.

Roger, does that correspond with one of your transmit periods?

73, Dave G3WCB



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_= group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_l= f_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Martin Evans
Sent: 05 January 2011 21:50
To: rsgb_lf_group@blackshe= ep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - reports appreciated





> You only need approximate time sync - a second or two is good enough.=
>
> 'JNT


Oh what fun!

Got the clock on the synched puter up, trying to get the clock on the duff=
puter matched up.

Harder than it sounds!

Anyway, the signal that I can see is G8IMR at -21dB.

Sorry Roger.

Martin =A0GW3UCJ Swansea.






--
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
= www.youtub= e.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM=A0=A0 GQRP 1678= =A0=A0=A0 ISWL G11088
--20cf30549df5bcb259049920a1b4--