Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.214]) by air-da03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA032-86134d345922eb; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:58:42 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9A98838000095; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:58:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PeqWc-0004GA-Ck for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:57:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PeqWb-0004G1-S4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:57:41 +0000 Received: from mail-pv0-f171.google.com ([74.125.83.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PeqWZ-0002ry-26 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:57:41 +0000 Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so791783pvg.16 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:57:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L1Kfhq2jjwqFAdseVipzjnwjydSngqsQV2RDBT/gh78=; b=MEkfYoUnnjQKGoLbipnnX8GuEyo78bcixgc9CRfMpddmxJR/baupAzP9zWKU/f9vFk Xx+1gEa9KkEMKeH5MFW0qiyB58UeZlqpfMIWVORlxQV2O+MNpxPlyEaLqTbfW0wgm/ZR 3HP6+/NvTE5ieQ1Acju2zTqW1owx6Oav+cWwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=t/6yPdz1AWRzYXd8XsKJ09OTFrfyfef5eSeEL29HBQOMvtsi4JNPiJGT/4k6oQT+uo chzhJk1OOyJ0hpLo5/ehvBb53+LtBpUTncY53PgkIrQfv8FaUX0TOGRceBTX51L3y87g qKRoYeIumDQrLZIFKL5Ms6Cu96r1QD9RLsvbs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.174.7 with SMTP id w7mr3816132wfe.46.1295276251810; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:57:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.11.11 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:57:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D3454EA.9070003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <003301cbb568$1a159780$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4D3454EA.9070003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:57:31 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anton_B=E4rtschi?= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2bf8ae00a37049a0c0069 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m289.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d64d345920464d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --000e0cd2bf8ae00a37049a0c0069 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan Thank you for the info. The site we will use is Sottens , where the last medium wave broadcast transmitter in Switzerland was shut down Dec.= 31. last year. I will probably not have to put a Kilowatt of LF into the 125m mast to get 1WERP, hi. Here some picsfrom the site. I'm looking forward to have a QSO with you in good old CW. 73 de Toni, HB9ASB 2011/1/17 Stefan Sch=E4fer > Hi Tony, > > We haven't had QSO before but i am looking forward with interest to your= LF > activity and hope to be QRV as well. I am using a 100m or 300m vertical > antenna and i am QRV in regularly CW. You will hear my signal! :-) > > I've used an ordinary 50 Ohm attenuator of 14 dB just to prevent > overloading my 706 as i used a 100m vertical recently. But the AF signal > levels were poor so don't forget your headphones, as i did ;-) I will tr= y a > 50 Ohm band filter in the next test to prevent overloading by stations= at > 153 kHz and 129 kHz and all outside the band... > > Good luck! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 16.01.2011 18:48, schrieb Anton B=E4rtschi: > > Hi Mal > Thank you for the response. So I will take my attenuator box to the site= , > connect the mast to the RX and see what happens. It will be difficult to= get > a receiving antenna far away enough, and I hope we will not get to much= QRM > from the line running up the mast for the lights, or from something else= . > But I will have a lot of help there. Ham engineers and operators. May be > some of them will get the LF virus and get in my footsteps. Soon I'll= be > back with more news about this event and I'm looking forward with pleasu= re > for our next CW QSO. Digital modes are not on the plan - maybe QRSS3 if > there is a need for. > 73 de Toni > > BTW. For those who speak German: I will report about the event on my Blo= g: > www.funkperlen.wordpress.com > > > --000e0cd2bf8ae00a37049a0c0069 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan
Thank you for the info.

The site we will use is Sottens, where the last medium wa= ve broadcast transmitter in Switzerland was shut down Dec. 31. last year.<= br> I will probably not have to put a Kilowatt of LF into the 125m mast to get= 1WERP, hi. Here some pics from the site= .
I'm looking forward to have a QSO with you in good old CW.

73= de Toni, HB9ASB


2011/1/17 Stefan Sc= h=E4fer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
=20
Hi Tony,

We haven't had QSO before but i am looking forward with interest to your LF activity and hope to be QRV as well. I am using a 100m or 300m vertical antenna and i am QRV in regularly CW. You will hear my signal! :-)

I've used an ordinary 50 Ohm attenuator of 14 dB just to prevent overloading my 706 as i used a 100m vertical recently. But the AF signal levels were poor so don't forget your headphones, as i did ;-)= I will try a 50 Ohm band filter in the next test to prevent overloading by stations at 153 kHz and 129 kHz and all outside the band...

Good luck!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 16.01.2011 18:48, schrieb Anton B=E4rtschi:
Hi Mal
Thank you for the response. So I will take my attenuator box to the site, connect the mast to the RX and see what happens. It will be difficult to get a receiving antenna far away enough, and I hope we will not get to much QRM from the line running up the mast for the lights, or from something else. But I will have a lot of help there. Ham engineers and operators. May be some of them will get the LF virus and=A0 get in my footsteps. Soon I'll be back with more news about thi= s event and I'm looking forward with pleasure for our next CW QSO. Digital modes are not on the plan - maybe QRSS3 if there is a need for. 73 de Toni

BTW. For those who speak German: I will report about the event on my Blog: ww= w.funkperlen.wordpress.com



--000e0cd2bf8ae00a37049a0c0069--